The statement best compares the two passages in that the first passage hints that the family should not trust Walter with money or business matters, and the second passage confirms it.
<h3>What are the comparisons between both the passages?</h3>
The first passage intimations that no trust should be placed in Walter regarding business matters and Beneatha and Ruth respond to this by interchanging diverted looks, which allow that this is an open lie.
And in the second passage, we get the confirmation of what is hinted in the first when the Mother, after finding out what happened, starts propelling her son, in anger, not recognizing him as her son, until Beneatha interacts.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about passages, refer:
brainly.com/question/23662376
Answer:
youd know if you read the paragraph
Explanation:
duh
Answer: Cassius has devised a plan to persuade Brutus to act against Caesar.
Explanation:
Brutus is a character from Shakespeare's <em>Julius Caesar</em>. He is Caesar's friend who joins a conspiracy against Caesar.
At the end of <em>Act I, Scene II</em>, Cassius plans to convince Brutus to join a group of conspirators. Brutus is essential for the murder plan, because Caesar trusts him, as opposed to Cassius.
Cassius thus devises a plan to write letters and throw them at Brutus's window. The letters are intended to discredit Caesar. Cassius wants Brutus to believe that those letters come from Roman citizens, which will make him change his opinion about Caesar and participate in the murder plot.
Answer:it is a negative connotation
Explanation:because max did a wrong thing by snatching the diary.
