Answer:
The question of “did women have a renaissance” is not something that has not been asked before. In 1977 Joan Kelly wrote an essay addressing this question specifically. In the Renaissance, when the political systems changed from the Medieval feudal systems, women of every social class saw a change in their social and political options that men did not. Celibacy became the female norm and "the relations of the sexes were restructured to one of female dependency and male domination" (Kelly 20). Women lived the life of the underlying sex. Men ruled over everything, even through half a century of Queens.
“When England was ruled for half a century by Queens but women had almost no legal power; When marriage, a women’s main vocation, cost them their personal property rights; when the ideal women was rarely seen and never heard in public; when the clothes a women wore were legally dictated by her social class; when almost all school teachers were men; when medicine was prepared and purified at home; when corsets were
constructed of wood and cosmetics made of bacon and eggs; when only half of all babies survived to adulthood?" (Hull 15).
The above passage says a lot about women in the Renaissance. The role of women was a very scarce role. Women were supposed to be seen and not heard. Rarely seen at that. Women were to be prim and proper, the ideal women. Females were able to speak their minds but their thoughts and ideas were shaped by men. Mostly everything women did had input given by men. Women were controlled by her parents from the day she is born until the day she is married, then she would be handed directly to her husband so he could take over that role. In the time of the renaissance women were considered to legally belong to their husbands. Women were supposed to be typical ‘housewives.'
Explanation:
I'm guessing he was old lol
Slavery would be prohibited in the Louisiana Territory was not part of the Missouri Compromise.
Explanation:
- Acquisition of Louisiana nearly doubled the size of early America. This land acquisition provided space for settlers and enormous economic opportunities in agriculture and raw materials. The new country also sparked much debate among Congress over what would be allowed in any new state that would join the Union, especially the institution of slavery.
- The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was very important for various reasons. The compromise itself resolved, for the time being, the dispute over where slavery should and could exist in recently acquired Louisiana territory.
- He urged that slavery did not exist above the 36 ° 30 'longitude.
- The exception was Missouri, which entered the Union in 1820 as a slave state under compromise.
- In addition to Missouri, Maine also entered the Union as a free state (formerly part of Massachusetts) to balance the number of free and slave states in the nation. This seeks to achieve equality of slaves and free states, together with a balance in Congress.
Class: History
Level: Middle school
Keywords: Missouri Compromise
Learn more on Missouri Compromise on
brainly.com/question/4526851
brainly.com/question/2143928
#learnwithBrainly
<span> Free contact is the concept that people may decide what agreements they want to enter into </span>
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the second choice "banning the formation of labor unions"
The New Deal<span> was a series of programs, including, most notably, Social Security, that were enacted in the United States between 1933 and 1938, and a few that came later.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
