No child left behind is when kids are not failed and Miranda v Arizona decided the detained criminal suspect prior to police questioning must be informed of their constitutional rights to an attorney and against self-incrimination Miranda was not informed of his rights prior to the police interrogation
Hülegü Khan of the Mongols
The answer should be the right to personal property since the Ninth Amendment protects rights that aren't mentioned in the Constitution. (speech and religion are in the 1st Amendment, and right to a fair jury is the Sixth Amendment)
Hope this helps!
The correct answer is that it was about <span>deterring the soviets from all out war by threatening a full nuclear response to any aggressive act.
Basically, what this means is that they announced that if there was even a slight possibility that the Soviets would attack them or if they did attack them, they would go full on with nukes on them and would not think about repercussions. This was later reverted as anyone with a clear head understood that nukes were not a good option.</span>
