"The second count alleges a conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States, to-wit, to use the mails for the transmission of matter declared to be non-mailable by title 12, 2, of the Act of June 15, 1917"
According to the bolded lines, what is one reason for Schenck’s indictment?
<em>The answer is B. He tried to send something through the mail illegally. </em>
In the text they tell us that the first charges that are presented are for trying to cause insubordination in the military and naval forces of the United States, this means they don't like how EEUU are recruting and enlisting people for war, which indicates that the three answers A, C and D would go against the ideals of the accused. Moreover, the bold lines inform us that the accused tried to use the mail to send confidential information of the United States, which violates a law making it an illegal act.
What is the most useful next step in the writing process for Lauren?
The answer is C. Determine how these sources relate to one another
She needs to understand why are these lightning strikes happening so close and compare if what the eye-witness saw is similar to what the storm chaser said. In order to write a conclusion and make an organizational plan, Lauren needs to understand the connections between her sources so she can write.
If my answer helped you please give me five stars and best answer. I'm trying to level up.
Answer: Adam Smith would have disagreed with this statement. He believed government should not regulate the economy or control trade.
Explanation:
Even though Adam Smith believed that the government had a role to play in the economy, he believed that this role should be limited to National defense, upholding civil law and providing public services like education.
He would therefore be against the government regulating trade agreements that allow the passage of goods and services into and out of the country. Karl Marx and John Maynard Keynes on the other hand, advocated for government intervention, albeit in varying quantities.
As well as being useful, our possessions represent our extended selves. They provide a sense of past and tell us “who we are, where we have come from and perhaps where we are going”, says Russell Belk, who studies consumerism at York University in Toronto, Canada
Answer:
A
Explanation:
seems like the only one that seems out of place
