Answer:
Casey would prefer option 1; that he pays the premiums ($8,000). Even if Casey cannot deduct his insurance premiums as medical expenses, his income will only be reduced by $8,000. If he decided to take option 2, his income would be reduced by $8,800 (= $10,000 - 12%), so he is saving $800 by taking option 1.
On the other hand, Jean would prefer option 2; that her salary is reduced by $10,000 and her employer pays the premiums. By choosing option 2, Jean is going to lose $6,500 (= $10,000 - 35%). If she chose option 1, her income would be reduced by $8,000, so she is saving $1,500 by choosing option 2.
Answer:
A. ACL
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the most essential antispoofing technique would be ACL or Access Control Lists. This tool limits access to the router to only those on the list and thus preventing spoofing on the routers. Which is why it is a top recommendation by Cisco for this type of scenario.
Alright, so we start out with $12000, and we'd add from there. Since we add 1$ for every passenger, our equation with p being the number of passengers would be 1*p (e.g. for 1 passenger we have 1*1=1, 2 passengers we have 1+1(2 times)=2). Substituting 50,000 for p, we have 1*50,000=50,000. Next, we have to add 12,000 to that (as that's a flat fee) to get 50000+12000=62000
Explanation:
If Jamie notifies the bank within 2 days of the lost card , her liability for unauthorized would be $50.
Answer:
$360,644
Explanation:
The computation of the amount paid for an investment is as follows:
= Payment made × ((1 - (1 + rate of interest)^-number of years) ÷ rate of interest
= $49,000 × ((1 - (1 + 0.06)^-10) ÷ 0.06)
=$360,644
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Hence, the amount paid for an investment is $360,644
