Answer:
C. Dramatic irony.
Explanation:
Dramatic irony is when the audience or readers know the scenes or events of the story that the characters don't. In other words, dramatic irony is when we know what will happen or are privy to parts of the story's plot which the characters don't know.
In the given scene from Act V scene iii of William Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet", we can know the real condition of Juliet's red lips. We knew that she had taken poison to make her appear dead but will wake up later, which Romeo has no idea about. So, this is dramatic irony, where the readers or audience know some detail about the scene which the character(s) involved don't know.
Thus, the correct answer is option C.
Answer: First he <u>showed</u> his hand in a <u>mirror</u> to make it <u>obvious</u> that he still had both hands.
Answer:
whatcha sayin? where the question?
It seems that the BJP government’s decision to illegalise the sale of cattle for slaughter at animal markets has its roots in a PIL that quotes the five-yearly Gadhimai festival in Nepal, where thousands of buffaloes are taken from India to be sacrificed to ‘appease’ Gadhimai, the goddess of power.
The contradictions that emerge from cattle – here encompassing all bovines – slaughter rules in Nepal perplex many: despite being predominantly Hindu, animal sacrifice continues to be practised. Cow slaughter is explicitly prohibited even in Nepal’s new constitution since it is the national animal, yet the ritual sacrifice of buffaloes and the consumption of their meat is not frowned upon. There is also, in marked contrast to the Indian government’s blanket approach to cattle terminology, a lucid distinction between cows (both the male and female) and other ‘cattle’ species (such as buffaloes and yaks).
The emergence of this contradictory, often paradoxical, approach to cattle slaughter in Nepal is the result of a careful balancing act by the rulers of modern Nepal. The Shah dynasty and the Rana prime ministers often found themselves at a crossroads to explicitly define the rules of cattle slaughter. As rulers of a perceived ‘asal Hindu-sthan’, their dharma bound them to protect the cow – the House of Gorkha borrows its name from the Sanskrit ‘gou-raksha’ – but as they expanded into an empire, their stringent Brahminic rules came into conflict with des-dharma, or existing local customs, where cattle-killing was a norm. What followed was an intentionally ambiguous approach to cattle slaughter, an exercise in social realpolitik.
The exchanging of information. Means of connection.
Different ways of communication are: Speaking, Sign language, Notes (paper messages), etc...
