1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iogann1982 [59]
3 years ago
10

Why do you think government officials (and the public in general) were opposed to labor unions in the beginning? Why do you thin

k things began to change during the hard economic times of the 1930s?
History
1 answer:
Lelechka [254]3 years ago
5 0

I'll answer this question with some of my general knowledge. Let me know if I helped you or not.


I believe officials were opposed to labor unions when they began to acknowledge how much of a threat it would be to manufacturing and other sorts of jobs. Labor Unions are similar to going on strike, or protesting something. With protesting laborers, businesses and factories would drop in revenue and would become unproductive. They would end up having to increase pay and improve working conditions to earn their workers back. This is equivalent to the loss of income for businesses.

I believe times changed in the 1930 because the American economy was extremely poor. The 1930's was the time of The Great Depression, multiple stock market crashes, and The Dust Bowl. These events hit hard and poverty became <em>wide spread. </em>


Hope I answered your question :)

You might be interested in
Help Pls
enyata [817]

Answer:

Q.1 What happened during the rise of the Berlin Wall ?

After several weeks of civil unrest, the East German government announced on 9 November 1989 that all GDR citizens could visit West Germany and West Berlin. Crowds of East Germans crossed and climbed onto the Wall, joined by West Germans on the other side in a celebratory atmosphere.

Q.2 What happened during Fall of the Berlin Wall?

some outcomes of the fall of the Berlin Wall were the end of travel restrictions for East Germans, a sudden increase of East Germans moving to the West, and the change from a planned economy to a free market.

6 0
3 years ago
When was the Great Depression and how long did it last?
Sedaia [141]

1930 to 1941...............

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
10 POINTS!!! HELP!
Mkey [24]

Answer:

I believe that the answer for this is C but I'm not sure if that's correct

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP FAST!!! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!
weeeeeb [17]
Federal court case that dealt with the formation of a federal bank and a series of individual banks. The case of McCulloch v. Maryland started through a series of important events that involved a number of laws. The following laws will allow you to understand what was going on with the McCulloch v. Maryland case. 

In 1816, the United States Congress passed an Act that allowed Federal Banks to be located and to operate within individual states in the U.S. Two years later, in 1816, the state of Maryland passed an Act that placed all banks and financial institutions that operated in the state under the taxation model of Maryland. This law thus made banks and other financial institutions in the state, including all federal banks, to pay Maryland state tax. A year after the passing of this law, McCulloch v. Maryland was heard.

McCulloch v. Maryland: The Case Profile

The case of McCulloch v. Maryland was heard in 1819. The case was tried in the Supreme Court of the United States. Andrew McCulloch was the defendant in McCulloch v. Maryland. McCulloch was the appointed manager of the Federal Bank located in Baltimore, Maryland. McCulloch refused to pay the state tax imposed by Maryland; he believed that federal banks were not subject to state taxation. 

In McCulloch v. Maryland, the state was the plaintiff. The state of Maryland believed that the federal bank should pay state taxes because they were operating on their land and using their resources. 

McCulloch v. Maryland: The Verdict

The United States Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland ruled in favor of the defendant, Andrew McCulloch. The United States Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland ruled in favor of the defendant because the Necessary and Proper Clause of the United States Constitution stated that the Federal Government was permitted to operate banks within individual states without paying taxes. The decision in McCulloch v. Maryland created a precedent; it led to a number of future decisions involving taxation issues and the federal government. 

COMMENTS

2 comments

No related posts.

Share

RELATED ARTICLES

Roper v. Simmons

Thomas Jefferson

20% of HIV-Infected Youth were Unaware of Status

Alabama Forms

Alaska Forms

Arizona Forms

Arkansas Forms

California Forms

Colorado Forms

Connecticut Forms

District Of Columbia Forms

Delaware Forms

Florida Forms

Georgia Forms

Idaho Forms

Hawaii Forms

Illinois Forms

Indiana Forms

Iowa Forms

Kansas Forms

Kentucky Forms

Louisiana Forms

Maine Forms

Maryland Forms

Massachusetts Forms

Michigan Forms

Minnesota Forms

Mississippi Forms

Missouri Forms

Montana Forms

Nebraska Forms

Nevada Forms

New Hampshire Forms

New Jersey Forms

New Mexico Forms

New York Forms

North Carolina Forms

North Dakota Forms

Ohio Forms

Oklahoma Forms

Oregon Forms

Pennsylvania Forms

Rhode Island Forms

South Carolina Forms

South Dakota Forms

Tennessee Forms

Texas Forms

Utah Forms

Vermont Forms

Virginia Forms

Washington Forms

West Virginia Forms

Wisconsin Forms

Wyoming Forms

Alabama Codes & Statutes

Alaska Codes & Statutes

Arizona Codes & Statutes

Arkansas Codes & Statutes

California Codes & Statutes

Connecticut Codes & Statutes

Delaware Codes & Statutes

District of Columbia Codes & Statutes

Florida Codes & Statutes

Georgia Codes & Statutes

Hawaii Codes & Statutes

Idaho Codes & Statutes

Illinois Codes & Statutes

Indiana Codes & Statutes

Iowa Codes & Statutes

Kansas Codes & Statutes

Kentucky Codes & Statutes

Louisiana Codes & Statutes

Maine Codes & Statutes

Maryland Codes & Statutes

Massachusetts Codes & Statutes

Michigan Codes & Statutes

Minnesota Codes & Statutes

Mississippi Codes & Statutes

Missouri Codes & Statutes

Montana Codes & Statutes

Nebraska Codes & Statutes

Nevada Codes & Statutes

New Hampshire Codes & Statutes

New Jersey Codes & Statutes

New Mexico Codes & Statutes

New York Codes & Statutes

North Carolina Codes & Statutes

North Dakota Codes & Statutes

Ohio Codes & Statutes

Oklahoma Codes & Statutes

Oregon Codes & Statutes

Pennsylvania Codes & Statute
3 0
3 years ago
What Is the Beringian Theory?
Goryan [66]

Answer:

Beringia was basically the exposed floor of the Bering Sea between and around Siberia and Alaska. The Bering Strait was part of Beringia, and it connected the two land masses of Siberia and Alaska. Historians theorize that our ancestors crossed the Bering Strait from Siberia into Alaska during the last Ice Age.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is an explanation of buildup and movement
    5·1 answer
  • Who did the United States acquire the Texas Annexation from in 1845?
    13·2 answers
  • What is one reason that the exodus is important to Judaism
    14·1 answer
  • Review the information in the graphic organizer based on
    8·1 answer
  • 10 example of sensory language in the story eleven by sandra cisneros
    9·1 answer
  • Who was the first African American to serve as a state governor?
    5·2 answers
  • Respond to the following based on your reading.
    10·2 answers
  • Can you guys please answer 3 and 4 please? Please.
    8·1 answer
  • What is an ayatollah?
    13·2 answers
  • 22. (05.05 MC)
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!