Slavery tolerated because of "necessity" means that you do not really want to do it, but you think you must do it. An example is when you have a farm and you need people to work on it. The trouble behind this scenario is that your farm isn’t making money to pay your farm helpers their proper wages, so you resort to slavery. In this case, you do not need money for salaries because your farm is doing well to keep your slaves clothed and fed.
Slavery affirmed as a "moral right" is when you think it is your right to be the master and the slaves deserves to be slaves.
Answer:
yo we are here to help you. not give you the answer. you gotta do something here.
Explanation:
Answer:
<em>1</em><em>. </em><em>A </em><em>person </em><em>who </em><em>favored </em><em>the </em><em>constitution</em><em> </em><em>because</em><em> </em><em>its </em><em>provided</em><em> </em><em>for </em><em>a </em><em>strong</em><em> </em><em>national</em><em> </em><em>government</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>They </em><em>believed </em><em>a </em><em>strong</em><em> </em><em>central</em><em> </em><em>authority</em><em> </em><em>was </em><em>necessary</em><em> to</em><em> </em><em>defend</em><em> </em><em>the </em><em>nation</em><em> </em><em>and </em><em>keep </em><em>it </em><em>united.</em><em> </em>
<em>2</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>Those </em><em>citizen </em><em>who </em><em>favored </em><em>the </em><em>Constitution</em><em> </em><em>come </em><em>to </em><em>be </em><em>called</em><em> </em><em>Federalist</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>Federalist</em><em> </em><em>wanted </em><em>a </em><em>strong</em><em> </em><em>federal</em><em> </em><em>government</em><em>.</em>
<em>3</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>They </em><em>feared </em><em>the </em><em>new </em><em>national</em><em> </em><em>government</em><em> </em><em>would</em><em> </em><em>be </em><em>too </em><em>powerful</em><em> </em><em>and </em><em>thus </em><em>threaten </em><em>individual</em><em> </em><em>liberties</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
<em>4</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>People</em><em> </em><em>who </em><em>oppose</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>to </em><em>the </em><em>ratification</em><em> </em><em>of </em><em>the </em><em>Constitution</em><em> </em><em>we</em><em>r</em><em>e </em><em>called</em><em> </em><em>the </em><em>Anti-Fed</em><em>e</em><em>ralist.</em>
Answer:
dark, negative, gloomy and other synonyms is what i think made the world war 1 poster effective.
Explanation:
i say this because the poster gave the people/citizens something in common to worry about, death and horror. this imagery probably made other posters least effective because some people don't like to see and/or experience death, horror, and negativity so they keep their heads up and ignore it.
hope this helps, also plz mark brainliest