1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bad White [126]
3 years ago
13

In a least 150 words answer the following question. Which of the three economic systems (market, planned, and mixed) do you beli

eve address the issue of scarcity the best? Give two examples of why this system is superior to the other choices.
History
2 answers:
ycow [4]3 years ago
7 0
Scarcity is the fundamental challenge that all individuals and nations must confront. Everyone faces some limitations, so we all have to make choices where we limit or allow ourselves to something.

Economists generally recognize four types of economic systems traditional, traditional, command, market and mixed.

A traditional economic system is shaped by tradition. The work that people do, the goods and services they provide, how they exchange resources… all tend to follow a pattern. The traditional system is bad at addressing scarcity because scarcity is formed off of new requirements people have through the ages and a traditional system would not evolve just as our requirements would.

In a planned economy, the government controls the economy. The state decides how to use and distribute resources. The government regulates prices and wages; it may even determine what sorts of work individuals do.
Socialism is a prime example of a planned economy. Socialism does not work because it is not consistent with the fundamental principles of human behavior. The failure of socialism in countries around the world can be traced to one critical defect: it is a system that ignores incentives.

Market economies allow all economic decisions to be made by individuals. The unrestrained interactions between individuals and companies in the marketplace determine what happens to all the good and resources.Individuals choose how to invest their personal resources and individuals decide what to consume. Within a pure market economy,  the government is entirely absent from economic affairs.

A mixed economic system combines elements of the market and command economy. Many economic decisions are made in the market by individuals. But the government also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources.

If scarcity is looked at on a macro level, the best economic system is mixed because it allows the government to also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources, while the individuals still stay happy because they have some control. The only problem is the eternal question of what the right mix between the public and private sectors of the economy should be.

There is no point to look at it on a micro level because almost no country is small enough to be considered on that level.









erica [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

I believe that the planned economic system is the most effective to combat scarcity problems.

Explanation:

The planned economy is one where all the production of national goods and services is totally and previously planned by a group of economic experts who know well the means of national production and the amount of consumption that the country's population establishes. For this reason, this type of economic system is able to predict moments of scarcity by developing guidelines to avoid them, they are also able to avoid problems of scarcity, since everything is highly planned.

You might be interested in
Besides Hungarian nationalism, the Habsburg Empire was also troubled by
meriva
The answer is Pan-Slavism
5 0
2 years ago
During the 19th century, one effect of European imperialism on Africa was *
malfutka [58]

exploitation of African natural resources by colonial powers

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In which countries was Islam established through trade, and in which countries was Islam established by invading Islamic armies?
svet-max [94.6K]
Trade: Malaysia and Indonesia
Trade: Sub-Saharan Africa
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For what reason did the city of Kiev initially dominate the other Russian cities?
shutvik [7]

Answer:

Access to Important trade routes

Explanation: The city of Kiev dominated the other Russian cities initially to conquer access of important trade routes.

4 0
2 years ago
By **blank** England had two clusters of colonies.
ruslelena [56]
By 1600 England had two clusters of colonies. 


8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 1979, the Shah of Iran was overthrown and a new government was established. This government immediately seized control of all
    10·1 answer
  • Drag the major events that led to communism in China in chronological order to arrange them from
    9·1 answer
  • In dessert regions, what can lead to conflict
    10·1 answer
  • what are the reasons for the lack of Indian unity in fighting Europeans was that the Indians were descended from different peopl
    14·2 answers
  • 1. Were women forced into a separate sphere in the 19th century? Why or why
    11·2 answers
  • The main opponents in World War II were the
    11·2 answers
  • Was the massachusetts bay colony a theocracy
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the discovery of the New World a momentous event?
    7·1 answer
  • What do you think Lyndon Johnson meant when he said that 'There is no Negro problem . . . There is only an American problem?"
    9·1 answer
  • Thursday Bell Work: Why was the First Continental Congress important and what role did South Carolina play in it?​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!