for the most part, historians view Andrew Johnson as the worst possible person to have served as President at the end of the American Civil War. Because of his gross incompetence in federal office and his incredible miscalculation of the extent of public support for his policies, Johnson is judged as a great failure in making a satisfying and just peace. He is viewed to have been a rigid, dictatorial racist who was unable to compromise or to accept a political reality at odds with his own ideas. Instead of forging a compromise between Radical Republicans and moderates, his actions united the opposition against him. His bullheaded opposition to the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Fourteenth Amendment eliminated all hope of using presidential authority to affect further compromises favorable to his position. In the end, Johnson did more to extend the period of national strife than he did to heal the wounds of war.
Most importantly, Johnson's strong commitment to obstructing political and civil rights for blacks is principally responsible for the failure of Reconstruction to solve the race problem in the South and perhaps in America as well. Johnson's decision to support the return of the prewar social and economic system—except for slavery—cut short any hope of a redistribution of land to the freed people or a more far-reaching reform program in the South.
Historians naturally wonder what might have happened had Lincoln, a genius at political compromise and perhaps the most effective leader to ever serve as President, lived. Would African Americans have obtained more effective guarantees of their civil rights? Would Lincoln have better completed what one historian calls the "unfinished revolution" in racial justice and equality begun by the Civil War? Almost all historians believe that the outcome would have been far different under Lincoln's leadership.
Among historians, supporters of Johnson are few in recent years. However, from the 1870s to around the time of World War II, Johnson enjoyed high regard as a strong-willed President who took the courageous high ground in challenging Congress's unconstitutional usurpation of presidential authority. In this view, much out of vogue today, Johnson is seen to have been motivated by a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution and by a firm belief in the separation of powers. This perspective reflected a generation of historians who were critical of Republican policy and skeptical of the viability of racial equality as a national policy. Even here, however, apologists for Johnson acknowledge his inability to effectively deal with congressional challenges due to his personal limitations as a leader.
Answer:
Surplus Resources
Industrialization and Commercialization
Development of Transport and Communication
Explanation:
Answer:
Correct answer is C the adoption of a strict moral legal code.
Explanation:
A is not correct because Roman empire had to pay a large amounts of money to maintain the costs of administration and army, and this was especially problematic after they were not able to conquer new territories.
B is not correct as this conflicts were destroying Roman Empire from the inside, especially in the 3rd Century. It brought political and economical decline.
C is correct as this laws were created to prevent the decline of Empire, but it was too late. Diocletian was the one who started this reforms.
D is not correct as they used mercenaries from Germanic tribes, who at the end destroyed the Empire.
The map is pointing to the middle colonies, but the middle colonies consisted of PA, NJ, Delaware etc, but the arrow is specifically on New Jersey so I would assume New Jersey.
The factor that was not a policy of Mikhail Gorbachev was he wanted to establish an entirely free-market capitalist economy.
<h3>What did Mikhail Gorbachev do?</h3>
Mikhail Gorbachev was the last premier of the Soviet Union and leader of the Soviet Communist Party.
He tried to reform the nations so that Communism would be saved in the Soviet Union while still keeping the economy intact. He however believed that Communism was the best way and did not want a free-market capitalist economy.
Options include:
- Openness
- More freedom for Soviet citizens
- establish an entirely free-market capitalist economy
Find out more on Mikhail Gorbachev at brainly.com/question/1286817
#SPJ1
