Answer:
b-There were few homeless people living in the cities, because everyone had a job at one of the factories.
Explanation:
got the answer from quizzizz, try searching the answer before asking :)
Answer:
Union: the action or fact of joining or being joined, especially in a political context.
Missouri Compromise: measure worked out between the North and the South and passed by the U.S. Congress that allowed for admission of Missouri as a slave state, Maine as a free state, and made free soil all western territories north of Missouri's southern border.
Confederacy: a league or alliance, especially of confederate states.
Habeas Corpus: a writ requiring a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court, especially to secure the person's release unless lawful grounds are shown for their detention.
Antietam: historic site in northwestern Maryland, on Antietam Creek, southeast of Sharpsburg, scene of a major Civil War battle in September 1862.
Ironclad: a 19th-century warship with armor plating
Reconstruction: the period 1865–77 following the Civil War, during which the states of the Confederacy were controlled by the federal government and social legislation, including the granting of new rights to African-Americans, was introduced
Reservation: an area of land set aside for occupation by North American Indians or Australian Aborigines.
Answer:
B. Quota system.
Explanation:
A quota is an official limit to the number of something that is allowed. In this case, it is Japan's quota on the number of foreign born people who are allowed to move to their country. Some countries, like Japan, practice a limited immigration policy. Immigration is the action of coming to live permanently in a foreign country. This limitation of immigration would no doubt decrease the rate in population growth, since less people are moving to their country.
It's right on Edge. Got 100% on unit test. TRUST ME.
Please click the heart if this helped & I hope this made your day a little better!
This speech is a primary source.
It is a primary source because it is a fragment from the event that was happening at that moment and because it is a direct expression of a figure that was active in such an event, i.e., women's movement.
The other questions are wrong because: there isn't such thing as a neutral source; a secondary source is a work of history produced by a historian that studied primary sources and analyzed them; as for unreliable, no source is completely reliable nor completely unreliable -- it always depends on what we are asking of it.
<span>by 1835, Texas was home to about 30,000 American settlers, known as Anglo-Texans</span>