Answer:
the sales in dollars sell to generate the target income is $183,334
Explanation:
The computation of the sales in dollars sell to generate the target income is shown below:
= (Fixed cost + target income) ÷ (selling price - variable cost) ÷ selling price
= ($25,000 + $66,667) ÷ ($30 - $20) ÷ $20
= $91,667 ÷ 50%
= $183,334
Hence, the sales in dollars sell to generate the target income is $183,334
What would likely raise Olivia's reservation wage is if Olivia learns that the job is more challenging than she initially thought
Reservation price is the least amount of wage that a worker would be willing to accept for services rendered.
<em><u>Factors that lead to changes in reservation wages</u></em>
- Finances: a worker that is in debt or in desperate need of money would have a lower reservation wage when compared with a person that is debt-free. For example, the reservation wage of a billionaire would be higher than the reservation wage of an homeless individual.
- Nature of the job: the more challenging a job is, the higher the reservation wage that would be demanded by a worker.
- Length of unemployment: the longer a person has been unemployed for, the lower the reservation wage.
To learn more about reservation wage, please check: brainly.com/question/14293413?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
I don't really know of Bill Smith but I know Adam
Smith's best - known ideas formed the basis of economic theory , including the invisible hand theory ( the idea that free - markets coordinate themselves ) , the division of labor ( the idea that people should specialize in specific tasks ) , and the measurement of economic activity ( Gross Domestic Product ) .
Please follow me and Mark as brainlest.
Thanks :-)
The SAFE act assures the payment of otherwise non-collectable court judgments against licensees who have committed fraud, misrepresentation, deceit, or conversion of trust funds in a transaction.
<h3>What is the SAFE act?</h3>
This was the act in the United States that made it mandatory for houses to be registered and licensed.
The act is based on houses that are used as residences. The full meaning of the act is the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act.
The main purpose of the SAFE act is to try to ensure that consumers are protected and also help in the reduction of fraud. This would be done by setting a standard for licensing and the originators of mortgage loans.
Hence the correct answer to the question is the SAFE act.
Read more on court judgement here; brainly.com/question/14077067
#SPJ1
