1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tigry1 [53]
3 years ago
7

What was the Supreme Court’s decision in Barron v. Baltimore in 1833?

History
2 answers:
Komok [63]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option  B.

The Bill of Rights did not apply at the state level.

Explanation: The background of the Barron vs Baltimore case was a law suit filed by John Barron against the city of Baltimore. He claimed that Baltimore city had possessed his private property without any proper compensation. According to Bill of Rights he filed this law suit and the court ordered city to pay Barron. But an appellate court reversed the decision. Then Baron appealed to the Supreme court.

In 1833, Supreme court gave the decision in favor of the city. The cpourt asserted that the Bill of Rights is only effective with the federal government. Because the federal government is created according to the constitution and federal government is bound to follow the constitution rules like as bill of rights.But the states government is not bound to follow the Bill of Rights.

Therefore, the answer is option B.

Svetllana [295]3 years ago
3 0

The Supreme Court’s decision in Barron v. Baltimore in 1833 was: The Bill of Rights did not apply at the state level. This implies the correct answer is B.

In 1833, the Supreme Court delivered a judgment in the case of Barron v. Baltimore. In its ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that the bill of right as enshrine in the constitution of the United States only restricts the power of the Federal government and not applicable to state governments.

<h2>Further Explanation</h2>

The case started after John Barron approached the state court to file a lawsuit against the city of Baltimore. John Barron in his argument claimed that the city has denied him of his property, which he told the court was in total violation of the Fifth Amendment, which states that a person must be fully compensated before private poverty can be taken by the government.

John Barron claimed the government has destabilized his wharf by placing sand that was cleared from road construction around his business premises.

However, the state court ruled in support of John baron and awarded the sum of $4,000 against the State. The city of Baltimore also approached the appellate court to appeal the decision of the state court and the amount awarded to John Barron was reversed.

John Barron appealed his case to the Supreme Court and the court ruled that the bill of right is not applicable to state government and held that the action of the city of Baltimore was not in violation of the Fifth Amendment.

LEARN MORE:

  • What was the Supreme Court's decision in Barron v. Baltimore in 1833? brainly.com/question/13748578
  • What was the supreme court’s decision in barron v. Baltimore in 1833?  brainly.com/question/13939380

KEYWORDS:

  • supreme court
  • barron v. baltimore
  • wharf
  • state court
  • 1833
You might be interested in
Pls help<br> How are tariffs an example of the shift towards isolationism for the US after WWI?
olga_2 [115]

Answer:

America set high tariffs on imports to keep out foreign products. This raised prices for American consumers because cheaper foreign products were kept out of the US market. Keeping foreign products out of the markets, left a little trade with other countries therefore beginning the isolationism

Explanation:

Hoped this helped

3 0
3 years ago
Which leader in the Mexican Revolution attacked American interest and avoided capture by the U.S. Army
Schach [20]
Pancho Villa .. Hope this help
6 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ASAP NO LINKS
Solnce55 [7]

Answer:

Treaty of Paris. which made france cede land.

I believe this is right I apolgise if not.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What conditions were part of the cycle of increased militarization? Select two options.
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

edge2020

4 0
3 years ago
A country with a                  economy generally has a high standard of living.
uranmaximum [27]
Countries that have "free-market" economy generally have better standards of living. It is an economy whereas it is dependent of supplies and demands. By no meaning it has no controls within the government.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • To what extent was the temperance movement a success?
    14·1 answer
  • Please help fast and explain if you can! Will give brainiest! (If I can)
    5·1 answer
  • What was the ”Corrupt Bargain”? A) a deal made between Jackson and the Cherokee Nation, in which the Cherokees were tricked into
    5·2 answers
  • Who is bob the builder ?
    15·2 answers
  • How did Austronesian migrations differ from other early patterns of human movement?
    5·2 answers
  • On what is the geologic time scale based?
    14·1 answer
  • 2 While in jail, Hitler wrote a book outlining his goals &amp; beliefs.<br><br> True?<br><br> False?
    6·2 answers
  • During the Australian gold rush of the 1850s, gold was discovered in all of the following places except __________. A. South Aus
    14·2 answers
  • The image below is a pamphlet written by
    9·1 answer
  • Which country in modern day Europe has seen the most dramatic change in territory between 1650 and today
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!