1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tigry1 [53]
3 years ago
7

What was the Supreme Court’s decision in Barron v. Baltimore in 1833?

History
2 answers:
Komok [63]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option  B.

The Bill of Rights did not apply at the state level.

Explanation: The background of the Barron vs Baltimore case was a law suit filed by John Barron against the city of Baltimore. He claimed that Baltimore city had possessed his private property without any proper compensation. According to Bill of Rights he filed this law suit and the court ordered city to pay Barron. But an appellate court reversed the decision. Then Baron appealed to the Supreme court.

In 1833, Supreme court gave the decision in favor of the city. The cpourt asserted that the Bill of Rights is only effective with the federal government. Because the federal government is created according to the constitution and federal government is bound to follow the constitution rules like as bill of rights.But the states government is not bound to follow the Bill of Rights.

Therefore, the answer is option B.

Svetllana [295]3 years ago
3 0

The Supreme Court’s decision in Barron v. Baltimore in 1833 was: The Bill of Rights did not apply at the state level. This implies the correct answer is B.

In 1833, the Supreme Court delivered a judgment in the case of Barron v. Baltimore. In its ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that the bill of right as enshrine in the constitution of the United States only restricts the power of the Federal government and not applicable to state governments.

<h2>Further Explanation</h2>

The case started after John Barron approached the state court to file a lawsuit against the city of Baltimore. John Barron in his argument claimed that the city has denied him of his property, which he told the court was in total violation of the Fifth Amendment, which states that a person must be fully compensated before private poverty can be taken by the government.

John Barron claimed the government has destabilized his wharf by placing sand that was cleared from road construction around his business premises.

However, the state court ruled in support of John baron and awarded the sum of $4,000 against the State. The city of Baltimore also approached the appellate court to appeal the decision of the state court and the amount awarded to John Barron was reversed.

John Barron appealed his case to the Supreme Court and the court ruled that the bill of right is not applicable to state government and held that the action of the city of Baltimore was not in violation of the Fifth Amendment.

LEARN MORE:

  • What was the Supreme Court's decision in Barron v. Baltimore in 1833? brainly.com/question/13748578
  • What was the supreme court’s decision in barron v. Baltimore in 1833?  brainly.com/question/13939380

KEYWORDS:

  • supreme court
  • barron v. baltimore
  • wharf
  • state court
  • 1833
You might be interested in
What battle did theodore roosevelt's rough riders help win in the spanish american war?
Artemon [7]

The answer in apex is "the battle of San Juan Hill"

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During the Gilded Age, most laborers were considered to be in?
Roman55 [17]

During the Gilded Age, most laborers were considered to be in the working class. inequality and social ills as the working classes and poor were forced to work more and more for less and less.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In two words or less, define and describe the Southern reaction to the Civil Rights act of 1964
seraphim [82]

Adjustment and Compliance

Explanation:

The response of the South to the civil rights act can be said to be of compliance. The leaders who were vocal opposers of discrimination subsided into acceptance of the law. The act reflected a period of adjustment from the South in response to the act.

Miniscule rioting and violence were observed and some businessmen and politicians could hold up the courage to display some sort of resistance. The ban called out in support of excluding blacks was greatest in the “rim states” which included parts of modern-day Virginia, Texas, North Carolina and Florida.  

3 0
3 years ago
Why does the Central Intelligence Agency have more freedom of action than that of other federal agencies
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

<h2><em>A</em></h2>

Explanation:

It answers to Congress only for its financial needs.

5 0
3 years ago
Pride in one’s (blank) contributes to feelings of nationalism.
irakobra [83]
Nationalism is taking pride in one's own nation. So put country in the blank my friend.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Although the park had looked like a good place to study, the sun glared down angrily. I had to squint at the bright pages in the
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not an elected official at the country level in arizona
    9·1 answer
  • In England, the concept of individual rights can be traced back to _____.
    14·2 answers
  • What is the significance of the Stamp Act Congress petition (1765) to Parliament?
    14·1 answer
  • Why was it so important to Europe's development that many people's beverage of choice switched from
    11·2 answers
  • Who resulted in many farmers losing their land?
    10·1 answer
  • What political organization did 10 british west indies territories scheduled for independence in 1962 attempt to form?
    12·1 answer
  • Globalization and Countries
    15·2 answers
  • What is 44 rounded off to the nearest 10​
    10·2 answers
  • Fred Korematsu argued that internment was unconstitutional mainly because iniemees
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!