All categories

3 years ago

What was the Supreme Court’s decision in Barron v. Baltimore in 1833?

History

2 answers:

Komok [63]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option B.

The Bill of Rights did not apply at the state level.

Explanation: The background of the Barron vs Baltimore case was a law suit filed by John Barron against the city of Baltimore. He claimed that Baltimore city had possessed his private property without any proper compensation. According to Bill of Rights he filed this law suit and the court ordered city to pay Barron. But an appellate court reversed the decision. Then Baron appealed to the Supreme court.

In 1833, Supreme court gave the decision in favor of the city. The cpourt asserted that the Bill of Rights is only effective with the federal government. Because the federal government is created according to the constitution and federal government is bound to follow the constitution rules like as bill of rights.But the states government is not bound to follow the Bill of Rights.

Therefore, the answer is option B.

Svetllana [295]3 years ago

3 0

The Supreme Court’s decision in Barron v. Baltimore in 1833 was: The Bill of Rights did not apply at the state level. This implies the correct answer is B.

In 1833, the Supreme Court delivered a judgment in the case of Barron v. Baltimore. In its ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that the bill of right as enshrine in the constitution of the United States only restricts the power of the Federal government and not applicable to state governments.

<h2>Further Explanation</h2>

The case started after John Barron approached the state court to file a lawsuit against the city of Baltimore. John Barron in his argument claimed that the city has denied him of his property, which he told the court was in total violation of the Fifth Amendment, which states that a person must be fully compensated before private poverty can be taken by the government.

John Barron claimed the government has destabilized his wharf by placing sand that was cleared from road construction around his business premises.

However, the state court ruled in support of John baron and awarded the sum of $4,000 against the State. The city of Baltimore also approached the appellate court to appeal the decision of the state court and the amount awarded to John Barron was reversed.

John Barron appealed his case to the Supreme Court and the court ruled that the bill of right is not applicable to state government and held that the action of the city of Baltimore was not in violation of the Fifth Amendment.

LEARN MORE:

What was the Supreme Court's decision in Barron v. Baltimore in 1833? brainly.com/question/13748578
What was the supreme court’s decision in barron v. Baltimore in 1833? brainly.com/question/13939380

KEYWORDS:

supreme court
barron v. baltimore
wharf
state court
1833

You might be interested in

Some countries in North America are richer in natural resources than other countries. Which of the following is the most likely

Taya2010 [7]

1) D, the country will have a greater economy
2) D, countries with limited resources have to import more than the export
3)A, she would join the Peace Crops
4)D, the United Nations
5)D, people are able to exercise direct control over the government
6)B, the leader expects to rule for life
7)B, a problem that cannot be contained within a countries borders
8)A, Civil Disobedience

6 0

3 years ago

What impact did President Reagan's ideology that the Soviet's were evil have on the U.S./Soviet Relationship?

nlexa [21]

Answer:

President Ronald Reagan and Soviet Common Secretary Mikhail ... “In Reagan's see, Gorbachev was a communist, and might be ... “But they required to discover a way to overcome forty a long time of Cold War philosophy. ... a teacher of history emeritus specializing in U.S. outside relations at the College of Virginia.

Explanation:

Hope this helped

7 0

2 years ago

In 1760, America's population was 92% this religion

Salsk061 [2.6K]

Protestants aka B were 92% of the american population in 1760

5 0

2 years ago

What American argued that overseas expansion was a "safety valve" to keep ambitious Americans content?

Serggg [28]

Answer:

Frederick Jackson Turner argued that overseas expansion was a "safety valve" to keep ambitious Americans content.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

World war II propaganda techniques

Olenka [21]

Answer:

Demonization: Artists portrayed enemy individuals as demons or monsters. Example: The poster above of the Japanese soldier with evil eyes.

Emotional Appeal: Viewers emotions were used in an effort to have them agree with the message.

Example: Posters showing that thousands of Americans have died by the hands of the Germans and Japanese.

Patriotic Appeal: Artists appealed to the love of one's country. These posters usually had a country's flag or some form of representation for that country. Example: The use of an American Flag or American soldier.

Name Calling: Artists called other group of people by their derogatory names. Example: Germans were called Huns and the Japanese were called Japs.

Appeal to Fear: The use of fear sought to build support and unite a group of people by instilling fear in the general population. It scared Americans, for example, into believing that the war had to be fought, otherwise, America was going to be invaded by monstrous Germans and Japanese.

Catchy Slogan: Artists used short phrases or words in an effort to grab the viewer's attention. These slogans had to be very easy to remember with a very clear message. These always utilized prejudice or racism that existed against these people. Example: Remember Pearl Harbor!

Bandwagon: The message was clear: the audience was told "everyone else is doing it." It made Americans want to be a part of the crowd, to not feel left out, and to "do their part." Example: A poster saying that victory is inevitable, so you should join and support the cause to be on the winning side...(because who doesn't want to be a winner!)

Explanation:

yw! :)

4 0

2 years ago