All categories

3 years ago

What was the Supreme Court’s decision in Barron v. Baltimore in 1833?

History

2 answers:

Komok [63]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option B.

The Bill of Rights did not apply at the state level.

Explanation: The background of the Barron vs Baltimore case was a law suit filed by John Barron against the city of Baltimore. He claimed that Baltimore city had possessed his private property without any proper compensation. According to Bill of Rights he filed this law suit and the court ordered city to pay Barron. But an appellate court reversed the decision. Then Baron appealed to the Supreme court.

In 1833, Supreme court gave the decision in favor of the city. The cpourt asserted that the Bill of Rights is only effective with the federal government. Because the federal government is created according to the constitution and federal government is bound to follow the constitution rules like as bill of rights.But the states government is not bound to follow the Bill of Rights.

Therefore, the answer is option B.

Svetllana [295]3 years ago

3 0

The Supreme Court’s decision in Barron v. Baltimore in 1833 was: The Bill of Rights did not apply at the state level. This implies the correct answer is B.

In 1833, the Supreme Court delivered a judgment in the case of Barron v. Baltimore. In its ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that the bill of right as enshrine in the constitution of the United States only restricts the power of the Federal government and not applicable to state governments.

<h2>Further Explanation</h2>

The case started after John Barron approached the state court to file a lawsuit against the city of Baltimore. John Barron in his argument claimed that the city has denied him of his property, which he told the court was in total violation of the Fifth Amendment, which states that a person must be fully compensated before private poverty can be taken by the government.

John Barron claimed the government has destabilized his wharf by placing sand that was cleared from road construction around his business premises.

However, the state court ruled in support of John baron and awarded the sum of $4,000 against the State. The city of Baltimore also approached the appellate court to appeal the decision of the state court and the amount awarded to John Barron was reversed.

John Barron appealed his case to the Supreme Court and the court ruled that the bill of right is not applicable to state government and held that the action of the city of Baltimore was not in violation of the Fifth Amendment.

LEARN MORE:

What was the Supreme Court's decision in Barron v. Baltimore in 1833? brainly.com/question/13748578
What was the supreme court’s decision in barron v. Baltimore in 1833? brainly.com/question/13939380

KEYWORDS:

supreme court
barron v. baltimore
wharf
state court
1833

You might be interested in

why were Americans shocked at the German invasion of Belgium, and why did Germany invade this small country?

puteri [66]

Answer:

Germany declared war on France. To avoid the French fortifications along the French-German border, the troops had to cross Belgium and attack the French Army by the north. Of course, Belgians refused to let them through, so the Germans decided to enter by force and invaded Belgium on Aug. 4, 1914

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Was farming & civilization a real improvement over hunting/ gathering

larisa86 [58]

In my opinion, yes. Farming allowed the people to stay where they were and build, as opposed to traveling with herds.

6 0

3 years ago

This excerpt from the Northwest Ordinance (1787) represents which Constitutional principle

wlad13 [49]

<span>it is the popular sovereignty</span>

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Describe the people who received services at settlement houses.

Vikki [24]

Answer:

They were urban and poor , they were immigrants, they needed education, healthcare, childcare, and employment resources.

Explanation:

Settlement houses were organizations that provided support services to the urban poor and European immigrants, often including education, healthcare, childcare, and employment resources.

7 0

3 years ago

Please paraphrase, thank you!

madreJ [45]

In order to paraphrase a text you should understand each paragraph's main ideas and then think of other citations and examples of your own to complete the logic of it.

1 - The Beard interpretation has two main problems: first, there isn’t in the Constitution any confession or strong sign of the influence from those who believed the fundamental private rights of property being fundamentally anterior to government and morally unreachable for the popular majorities; second, it is impossible to deny the Constitution as a document in federalism.

2 - These problems should be addressed. The second is simple for it is consensual amongst Revolutionary era historians that the big question of that moment was: how to articulate diverse parts of an empire towards common purposes? And how to realize that articulation without taking one side more than another, without transforming demands for liberty and autonomy into central government undermining. It can be argued that’s the same debate over Federal aid to education.

3 - The Declaratory Act was a declaration of the British failure in solving this same problem, about which Edmund Burke sharply observed the impossibility of arguing anyone into slavery. When it was time for Americans to deal with this dilemma the Articles of Confederation were adequate when discussing the distribution of powers but lacking in sanctions. This deficiency was the cause of the Philadelphia Convention.

4 - Although Beard’s interpretation is convincing when arguing that those who wrote the Constitution belonged to the propertied classes, he is not as convincing about this being reflected on the Constitution itself. If the framers were trying to protect their property they didn’t succeed. Our analysis of the Economic Interpretation of the Constitution shows that the auteur’s reading of that historical moment fails to legitimate itself when confronted with the Constitution’s text. What each of the framers did after the Constitution and how it was directly linked to his class isn’t enough proof of the auteur’s argument if it isn’t shown also through the Constitution.

6 0

3 years ago