1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marta_Voda [28]
4 years ago
5

Rawls, thinks that people are justified in owning the objects and wealth that they do when

History
1 answer:
Free_Kalibri [48]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Rawls, thinks that people are justified in owning the objects and wealth they have when there are fair opportunities for any citizen within a region to own as well.

Explanation:

John Rawls was a philosopher and author of An Theory of Justice, Political Liberalism and Peoples' Law. He argued that the unequal distribution of income in a country and the social inequality caused by that distribution was something extremely wrong and that led nations to social failure.

He had arguments that showed that it was not fair that only a part of the population could possess goods and wealth. This would only be justified in a population where everyone had the same socioeconomic opportunities to own material goods of wealth, value and luxury.

You might be interested in
What would have happened if the holocaust was still active today?
poizon [28]
Well, lets just say there wouldn't be freedom for most people but at the same time we would be screwed.
7 0
4 years ago
The main reason that was glourious revolution was significant for american colonist was that
vfiekz [6]

Answer:

The Glorious Revolution showed that people could pursue a change of ruling power. It also provided many new ideas to American colonists

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Which was NOT a primary goal of Reconstruction?
trapecia [35]

Answer:

D rebuild the southern economy

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were women not considered Persons under Canadian law at the time?
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer:

Justice Robert Smith ruled unanimously that women were not “persons” under Section 24 of the BNA Act. Women were therefore ineligible for appointment to the Senate. Their decision was based on the premise that the BNA Act had to be interpreted the same way in 1928 as in 1867, when the Act was passed.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Diseases brought by explorers
solniwko [45]
The hell is the the questin
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What crime was George William Swepson guilty of committing
    9·1 answer
  • What were the challenges faced by the Weimar Republic during its rule?
    5·1 answer
  • What can you learn from Lincoln’s address about his attitude toward the South, the apparent losers in the conflict, and the Nort
    13·1 answer
  • Look at the map below. The countries that colonized the Americas during the 15th through 18th centuries came mostly from which r
    5·1 answer
  • Using the map below answer the following: North America's industrial areas
    7·1 answer
  • Improvements to Atlanta's infrastructure could have lessened the 1996 Olympics issue of A) housing. B) public safety. C) communi
    6·2 answers
  • Cai get help on this one please
    7·1 answer
  • What were the important battles in the war of texas independence? why was each important?
    14·1 answer
  • This refusal by the Senate to approve the treaty is an example of...
    7·2 answers
  • How did northern and southern India differ in ancient china?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!