The example that contains an error in logic as worded is:
D. Mark's usual reason for not turning in his homework was because he forgot his backpack.
Here, we have an adverb of reason (because), which functions as a subordinating conjunction and makes up an adverbial clause of reason. Using the word "because" after previously using the word "reason", implicates some sort of redundancy.
The logical structure to express this idea would be the following:
D. Mark's usual reason for not turning in his homework was that he forgot his backpack.
<span>Well she can buy 4 of
the ten packs though that would give her five extra, she could buy 35
single note pads which would give her the exact amount, or she could buy
3 of the ten packs and 5 of the singles.
</span>
<span>skills and experiences that are highly valued by the employer</span>
Answer:
I believe the answer would be 2
Explanation:
Seeing how Kerry blames his/her father for not taking them to the fireworks shows the lack of connection between the two of them, paragraph 2 is also the only one that directly mentions more than one character. Hope this helps, correct me if I'm wrong!
