The middle ages in Europe were pretty terrible. Politically, kings ruled directly over groups of people, or over whole countries. The kings answered to the Pope generally. Economically, the kings and their nobles owned most of the profits of hard labor, while the townspeople after were treated to low wages. A sizable gap between classes was seen economically, and there was little room for changes in a persons economic class. Socially, the structure went like this: beggars and thieves, serfs (or non land owning peasants), knights, nobles and bishops, kings, the Pope.
Answer:
George H.W. Bush (1989 - 1993) and Bill Clinton (1993 - 2001)
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Yes, I do believe that the government should have the right to limit peoples' individual rights. Though the wording of the sentence above may sound like I'm saying I believe the government is allowed to control people, that's the last thing I mean. People need rules and structure which is what the government provides. Imagine if there <em>wasn't</em> a government. There would be no soical order because people will have too much power and some will not use their civil liberties responsibly. I understand both sides, but overall, I do think the government should have the right to limit peoples' individual rights.
