Some have argued that Unix/Linux systems reuse a small number of security features in many contexts across the system, while Win
dows systems provide a much larger number of more specifically targeted security features used in the appropriate contexts. This may be seen as a trade-off between simplicity and lack of flexibility in the Unix/Linux approach, against a better targeted but more complex and harder to correctly configure approach in Windows. Discuss this trade-off as it impacts on the security of these respective systems, and the load placed on administrators in managing their security
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
False
Explanation:
IPv4 address are composed of four octets (8 bit numbers), ranging from <em>0.0.0.0 to 255.255.255.255</em>
All those 32 bits, in decimal notation, can form a total of
different addresses.
Being more than 4 billion addresses and ignoring that some addressesare reserved for special uses, even present human population almost doubles that number.
So it is safe to state that IPv4 addresses is <u>not </u>enough to give every blade of grass its own IP.