The 20/60/20 rule states that the total percent of employees who could commit a fraudulent act is <u>60% - 80%.</u>
More about the fraudulent employees :
Basically, it's a non-scientific ratio intended to illustrate how the workforce will typically fall into one of three categories whenever a significant organizational change is anticipated
What it tries to say is:
20 percent will be on board and prepared to make the modifications as needed. 60 percent of people will be aware of the need for change, even though they are still dubious about it. 20% won't be participating at all. While it is the responsibility of the leader to advocate for change, it is unlikely that there will ever be a time when all employees are on board.
Learn more about employees here:
brainly.com/question/14367772
#SPJ1
Explanation:
es esencial para favorecer una estructura innovadora y eficiente .si el conocimiento flute y se transmite de manera correcta en la organization este solo puede crecer?...
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": orientation.
Explanation:
Building orientation refers to the positioning of a building at the moment of its construction considering seasonal variations, the sun's path, and wind patterns. It is important at the moment of increasing the natural energy of the house since it can save important amounts of money in power service due to heating, lighting, and cooling.
In such a way, a correct building orientation contributes a house to feel more comfortable if it has more sunlight or cool breezes during summer.
Answer: Non-task sounding
Explanation:
The non-task sounding stage is the stage in business negotiation, where the negotiator tries to create a relationship with the client by just discussing on general matters and not necessarily talking about the business they want to transact on. The non-task sounding falls in the preparation stage of negotiation, the other stages are opening, bargaining and closure.
Answer:
According to the text, morality related to the reasons for economic inequality is acceptable
Explanation:
According to the text, morality related to the reasons for economic inequality is acceptable, since the government ensures the integrity for all citizens in an equitable manner so that everyone can build their wealth. The text explains how, it is fair for everyone to pay their taxes on equal terms and percentages since it would be inappropriate and unfair for people who have less income to pay less taxes than those with a higher social status. In my opinion, this theory applied to the context of real life does not turn out to be so appropriate, since it is possible to see the great economic breach between some social strata and their living conditions that often lack even the most basic rights for survival.