The statement is false because when you use distributive property, you get -12=-4+16 and when you add 16 to -4, you'll get 12, not -12, making the statement false.
In the given statement above, in this case, the answer would be TRUE. It is true that the inequality x + 2y ≥ 3 is satisfied by point (1, 1). In order to prove this, we just have to plug in the values. 1 + 2(1) <span> ≥ 3
So the result is 1 + 2 </span> ≥ 3. 3 <span> ≥ 3, which makes it true, because it states that it is "more than or equal to", therefore, our answer is true. Hope this answer helps.</span>
Answer:
3.7
Step-by-step explanation:
2r(pi)(∅/360)
2*3*(pi)*(70/360)
6*(pi)*(0.19444...)
3.665191429188092
3.7
