1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mazyrski [523]
3 years ago
10

What forces brought the destruction of the federalist party

History
1 answer:
Natalka [10]3 years ago
7 0

The main conflict that contributed to the destruction of the Federalist Party was its opposition to the War of 1812.

The War of 1812 was conflict between the United States and Great Britain, which broke out due to the US refusal to the naval blockade that Britain was trying to enforce to avoid trade with <em>Napoleonic France</em>.

In <em>New England</em>, the war was a matter of concern since their economy was highly dependent on trade. For this reason, the federalists of New England sent delegates to the<em> Hartford Convention</em> in 1814 to negotiate Constitutional amendments. However, the Federalist  Massachusetts Governor had already agreed a peace treaty with the British secretly. When the news spread, the federalists were considered by the public opinion to be disloyal, cowards and secessionists. At the end, this resulted in the destruction of the political party.


You might be interested in
Write a brief esay that describes the different tactics of the civil rights movement
babymother [125]
The Civil Rights Movement is an umbrella term for the many varieties of activism that sought to secure full political, social, and economic rights for African Americans in the period from 1946 to 1968.
Civil rights activism involved a diversity of approaches, from bringing lawsuits in court, to lobbying the federal government, to mass direct action, to black power.
The efforts of civil rights activists resulted in many substantial victories, but also met with the fierce opposition of white supremacists
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the US government help regulate
JulsSmile [24]

The Purpose of Government Regulation of Business. The U.S. government has set many business regulations in place to protect employees' rights, protect the environment and hold corporations accountable for the amount of power they have in a very business-driven society.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ASAP I NEED THIS BEFORE 1, PLEASE HELP ME. ;-;
beks73 [17]

Answer:

DIFFERENCES

<u>Geopolitical</u>

China's heartland was far larger and more cohesive, geographically and culturally, than Rome's. Rome had as

its heartland only central Italy, and even after conquering Italy, it held just that single peninsula bounded by

the Alps Mountains and the Mediterranean Sea. In the time of Augustus in Rome and the Han dynasty in

China, the Roman and Chinese empires each held about 60 million people, but in Rome only a few of these

millions were in Italy. In China virtually all were in "inner China," 90 percent of them in the North China Plain.

<u>Longevity and Persistence</u>

Rome's empire rose, fell, and was gone, although it lived on as a concept. China's empire has lasted for the

last two thousand years. Dynasties have come and gone, and sometimes the empire has broken into

fragments, but finally the empire endured as a single political entity. Today, although without an emperor,

China's geopolitical unity continues.

Policy and Powers of Assimilation

As China moved both north and south, it assimilated a great number of the peoples it invaded and

conquered. Non-ethnic Chinese were absorbed culturally and biologically. Many of the 95 percent of today's

Chinese population who are called "Han" are descended from ancestors who were not. The empire was held

together by Confucian and Buddhist ideology, supported by the power of the emperor and his armies. Rome's

empire was held together by law and backed by military power. Selected non-Romans could gain citizenship

under law, but ethnically and culturally the conquered peoples remained "other." Intermarriage with noncitizens was usually forbidden. Rome maintained the cultural distinctions far more than did China. .

SIMILARITIES

<u>Relations with Barbarians</u>

Both empires faced nomadic groups from central Asia who threatened and penetrated their boundaries.

Indeed, the Huns, who invaded Europe, and the Xiongnu, who invaded China, may have belonged to the same

ethnic group. Both empires settled the "Barbarians" near their borders and enlisted them in the imperial

armies. In both cases, the Barbarians came to hold great power. Ultimately, however, they dismembered the

Roman Empire while they were absorbed by the Chinese.

<u>Religious Policies</u>

Both empires incubated foreign religions, especially in times of imperial disorder, but in Rome, Christianity

did not save the empire, and by challenging the significance of earthly power it may even have contributed to

the empire's weakness. In China, Buddhism was absorbed into Confucianism and Daoism and helped to

sustain the national culture in times of political trouble.

<u>The Role of the Emperor</u>

Both empires ascribed divine attributes to the emperor, and both frequently had difficulty in establishing

rules for imperial succession. The Romans often attempted to choose their best general, while the Chinese

selected a man who could control the imperial family and court. Neither empire believed that a single

imperial family should rule forever.

<u>Gender Relationships</u>

Both empires subordinated women to men at all stages of life, and both drew analogies between hierarchies

and loyalties in a well-run family and those in a well-run empire. Both empires used marriages as means of

confirming political alliances with foreign powers. Both periodically felt that excessive concern with sexual

relationships was distracting energy away from the demands of sustaining the empire and instituted strict

codes of sexual morality. In China, far more than in Rome, women of the imperial family played an important

role in politics behind the scenes, particularly in terms of determining succession. One woman, the Empress

Wu (r. 690-705), took the throne herself.

<u>The Significance of Imperial Armies</u>

In both empires, the army was crucial in creating and sustaining the political structure in the face of domestic

and foreign enemies. The Roman Empire as established and ruled by generals, as were the Qin, Han, Sui, and

Tang dynasties in China the empires were periodically threatened and usurped by rebel generals asserting

their own authority. The cost of the armies, especially on distant, unprofitable expeditions, often bankrupted

the government and encouraged its subjects to evade taxes and military service and even to rise in revolt.

The Deployment of Armies of Colonization

Both empires used colonies of soldier-colonizers to garrison and develop remote areas while simultaneously

providing compensation and retirement benefits for the troops.  

please mark as brainliest

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The ideas of John Locke, an English philosopher, influenced the Founding Fathers to
Llana [10]
Hello there.

<span>The ideas of John Locke, an English philosopher, influenced the Founding Fathers to

</span>The ideas of John Locke, an English philosopher, influenced the Founding Fathers to <span><span>ensure protection for people's natural rights
</span>
Answer: </span><span>ensure protection for people's natural rights
</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where did many modern ideas about law originally come from?
miss Akunina [59]

Answer: theory/concept of natural state.

Explanation: Modern times (in philosophy usually associated with René Descartes, who died in 1650, i.e. times when so-called modern philosophy was initiated) mark the beginning of non-religious explanation of society. It means that social philosophers no more refer to Bible and Biblical mythology as their primary resource. Instead of that they work with the fiction of "natural state". These theories are usually called theories of natural state and within these concept one can find not only concept of human nature (as a part of modern philosophical anthropology) but also so called "natural rights" of men. It is especially Locke and Hobbes that mark that period in this respect, but also bit younger Jean Jacques Rousseau.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Draw something you learned about the 2000s. <br><br> Any ideas what I should draw?<br><br> 12 POINTS
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is another common reference for “city government”? A. urban government B. county government C. ordinance
    8·2 answers
  • How did Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution affect China?
    6·2 answers
  • How did the new state constitutions drafted during radical reconstruction expand public responsibilities and provide for equal r
    9·1 answer
  • Name 3 Native American groups who sided with the French
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following are not provided as part of the four main family functions? food and shelteraffection and lovepatterns an
    8·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast how life in the United States changed after Pearl Harbor with how it might change after the September 11th
    13·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP ILL GIVE U BRAINLYEST
    14·2 answers
  • South african education landscape​
    6·2 answers
  • What purpose did the introduction to the declaration of independence serve? it detailed how to amend the declaration of independ
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!