<span>They made sure that everyone knew the law standing firm that
justice was constant and enduring. They also framed the laws of Rome in the
Twelve Tablets which was constructed in the public square for all to see and
that no one will mistreated or denied their rights.</span>
The main difference is that a monk remains within his community while the friar has a public ministry. Generally speaking, once a monk enters the cloistered life, he does not leave. Friars are often given assignments in the world although they do have a communal life. This is why friars such as the Franciscans and Dominicans were very active in the evangelization of the New World while monks like the Benedictines established monasteries much later.
Answer:
Last option
because they were making 3 dollars a week, and were sometimes doing dangerous jobs, such as kids having clean out the sewing machines while one which tends to harm them or even kill them
Answer:
I think the consequences Alex and Jordan faced were fair. The reason behind this is because, when people fight, the end of it all will result in a consequence, whether they want it or not. I think they could've avoided getting into an argument if they had just been clear to each other, and not gotten so upset.
I tried to make it as clear and good as possible, I hope this helps! (:
I would need to agree that Radical Reconstruction was not sufficiently radical. The possibility of this was to change the south's general culture and conviction framework and make it more like the north. However the distinctive branches of the government couldn't deal with what was best for the country. Congress would pass laws that would help the liberated slaves, and after that the president would veto them, so congress would dwarf and abrogate the president. This occurred again and again. Because of this it was greatly hard for what the radicals needed to happen to be effective. There was insufficient power behind the new laws and amendment's, at any dislike they had utilized amid the common war