Answer:
A decrease in the elasticity of demand for the cartel's product.
Explanation:
The cartel is under the control of companies operating in the same area. This is undesirable. It is concluded between businesses and these contracts prevent competition. Such arrangements are also prevented by governments, which aims to promote competition among governments across the country. This type of arrangement creates unity and demonstrates business behavior in activities that prevent other competitors from entering the sector.
Adverse effects on consumers include:
1) Higher prices - cartel members can raise prices, which reduces the demand elasticity of any member.
2) Lack of Transparency - Members may agree to hide prices or hide information such as hidden charges in credit card transactions.
3) Limited production - Members may agree to limit market production, such as OPEC and oil quotas.
4) Build Market - Cartel members can collectively divide a market into regions or regions and not compete in each other's territory.
Answer:
a. True
Explanation:
The Activity variance is based on the difference in actual level of activity used in flexible budget and the level of activity accounted in the planning or master budget
Answer:
Followings are the example of new reality of American life during the Depression or war year is given below in the explanation part
Explanation:
The example is given below:
- Millions of American people made slum areas over the America in free land and fields because they lost their homes
- country people tried to find jobs in other countries, they did not find the job there.
- Faintness inverted people from farms to cities
Depression completely changed the way of Americans live
Answer:
The correct statement is expressed by option B - Firms with a low-cost position can reduce the threat of rivalry in an industry.
Explanation:
Firms with a low-cost position can reduce the threat of rivalry in an industry based on these reasons:
Firstly, these firms can decide to set their prices to be the same as the prices of higher-cost competitors.
Secondly, low-cost firms can decide to price their goods or services a little bit below the prices of their high-cost rivals.