Which details from the narration show that Rainsford is an experienced hunter and outdoor enthusiast? (Check all that apply) - b
ut what kind of men, he wondered, in so forbidding a place - an unbroken front of snarled and ragged jungle fringed the shore - some wounded thing, by the evidence a large animal, had to thrashed about it in the underbrush; - The jungle weeds were crushed down and the moss was lacerated; one patch of weeds with stained crimson - a small, glittering object not far away caught rainsford's eye and he picked it up. It was empty cartriged.
The answer is subjective- I would say all of the above. He is making observations and deductions based on logic. He is reflecting on his surroundings and acting. Define the terms and prerequisites for being labeled an outdoor enthusiast* or an experienced hunter*. Since the question said to check all that apply, we can assume that at least one of them fits these criteria for whomever wrote this question. If any of them would work, they should all be checked. If I'm incorrect, you have a strong argument against the validity of the question.
The mental process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating information to reach an answer or conclusion is called critical thinking.
