Answer: The author uses an example to point out how an alternative could satisfy both sides of the argument.
The pigs because they represent to communist government but also the horse who represents oppressed working class people who were poor. The horse was promised better things in exchange for work and believed they would fulfill their intentions of what the pigs said.
Answer:
Immediately following a counterclaim
Explanation:
because you want to say why what you're side of the argument is better after acknowledging the other side.
why do i keep seeing these questions?
