The open field doctrine states that officers are allowed to search and take evidence on private property outside of the immediate vicinity of a dwelling without obtaining a warrant.
- A "warrantless search of the area outside a property owner's curtilage" does not violate the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, according to the open-fields doctrine (also known as the open-field doctrine or open-fields rule) in American criminal procedural law.
- Explains that as long as objects are immediately recognizable as being subject to seizure and are within the sight of an officer who is legally present in the location from where the view is made, they may be properly confiscated without a warrant (illegal).
To know more about doctrine, kindly click on the link below :
brainly.com/question/11271619?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer:
Claudio Monteverdi
Explanation:
Was an Italian composer. His first opera was Orfeo which was the meeting of music an theatre.
Was presented in Italy at the theatre of the court of Mantua on 24 February 1607.
I believe if the are underange he may be forced unless certain situations things like joint custody might come into play. joint physical custody is where a court orders a child to spend a substantial amount of time with both parents during the course of the year. Second, joint legal custody is where, although one parent may have full physical custody, both parents must agree on any decisions that impact the child, such as their education, medical care and spiritual matters. Lastly, both joint physical and legal custody is a combination of the first two. IT IS ULTIMATELY up to the court to decide whether any type of joint custody is in the best interests of a child. If not, the parent with primary custodial rights over a child will get to decide what kind of visitation for the other parent is fair and reasonable. In many situations, this works out well for both parents and they can often come to an amicable arrangement regarding visitation hours and days.
Answer:
Well, Holism is the idea that various systems should be viewed as wholes, consequentialism does not specify the desired outcome, while utilitarianism specifies good as the desired outcome. including Deontology which focuses on the rules, or the universal norms. Virtue ethics you can say someone is morally right only if his actions express a certain virtue.
Explanation:
What is Holism? How is it different from utilitarianism, consequentialism, Deontology, and virtue ethics?
