Answer:
no he wasnt
Sure he removes the Royalty and all, but he never manages to do better in the ruling. He was power crazy, he kill those who disagree with him and use people to maintain his power, and all his promise for prosperity never achieved in his lives. Heck, he actually loses his first election and calls it void. He was a tyrannical ruler that are only slightly better than the old royalty, and better than Stalin who came after him.
He is not exactly the best example of a hero is. He is more of an idealist, and not cut out as a ruler, and he should never have come into power. Maybe as revolutioner, he is good and all but the person who should come into power should have been someone else.
The enslaved workers that received manumission were freed by slave owners in the colonial America.
<h3>What is a Manumission?</h3>
This refers to process of freeing a slave after they became a freedman.
Because the slave rendered favors, merits, personal qualities to the owner, he could become a freedman.
Therefore, the enslaved workers that received manumission were freed by slave owners in the colonial America.
Read more about Manumission
<em>brainly.com/question/1116729</em>
#SPJ1
It depends on you as to what you like to do and what you think would be good for the class.
B. Russia became a major exporter of grain after 2001
