1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ilya [14]
3 years ago
8

In one or two paragraphs, describe your ideal form of government. In your response, be sure to explain who has power, how much p

ower they have, where the power is located, and how power is distributed among branches of government. Then provide at least two reasons why you think this form of government would work well.
History
2 answers:
Novosadov [1.4K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

basically explain how you want the government to be run and who you want it to be ran by hope this helps

Eva8 [605]3 years ago
7 0
What she said..........
You might be interested in
What is one way in which the University of Georgia is unique among American universities? It was the first university establishe
frozen [14]

Answer: It was the first American university created by a state government.

The University of Georgia received its charter from the state in 1785, making it the first state-chartered public university in the United States. The university brands itself as the "birthplace of the American system of higher education." A site was selected for the university, but it did not begin admitting students until 1801, six years after the University of North Carolina.


4 0
3 years ago
What are some potential benefits and potential costs if total war and do the potential benefits ever outweigh the costs?
Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

The concept of "total war" refers to a type of armed conflict that is bound by no rules or limitations in terms of who is being attacked, the weapons that are used or the elements of society that will be sacrificed to win it.

Engaging in this type of war can have some benefits, such as:

There is no need for the government to define its objectives clearly.

Because of it, there is no accountability between the government and its citizens, which gives them free reign of action.

Countries with a strong military can use their full power.

However, the costs far outweigh the benefits:

Increased cost of human lives, from all parties involved.

The destruction of all civil society.

Because civil society is so disrupted, government institutions are likely to collapse as well.

Extremely difficult recovery process, both politically as economically.

Complete depletion of the country's resources.

Violation of human rights and the laws of just war.

Closes the door to any peaceful solution.

There is rarely, if ever, a situation in which a total war provides benefits that would outweigh the costs of it, or that would not be achieved through some other means.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why were Colonists angered by the new taxes placed on the colonies following the French and Indian War?
PtichkaEL [24]
The correct answer choice would be t<span>hey felt that they should have representation in Parliament.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
- from Article V of The United States Constitution
iogann1982 [59]

Answer:

D the president plays no formal part

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
7. Imagine a correspondence between Thomas Hobbes and John Locke . First, write a letter from Hobbes to Locke in which Hobbes ar
Leto [7]

Answer:

In this letter, you should:

1 - talk about the concept of State (or Power), considering the point of view of each philosopher;

2 - the idea behind the social contract, once again understanding the perspective of Hobbes and Locke;

3 - the State limitations, and the benefits of it, once again putting the ideas of each philosopher in perspective

Now, when it comes to the 18th-century despots, I think the better approach you have in hand is using the Divine Right of the Kings, a theory first stated in the 17th century.

Explanation:

Thomas Hobbes understand the idea that human being needs a strong state, and centralized power to maintain peace. They were living in a natural state, but with constant conflicts. To create a sense of "peace", humans offer their liberty to strong power and creates a state. Because of that, absolute monarchies is the better idea. Hobbes compares the political power of the state to a Leviatan, a mythological monster with several tentacles. And to control a monster such as this, a strong hand was necessary. An absolutist government, according to him, would maintain peace.  

On the other hand, Jonh Locke stated that a limited power was a better idea because once you put limits in a power, you can control it. The theory of the limited state is understood as an attempt to maintaining the order and the power on the hands of the people. Even with a king or emperor, it was necessary that people had control of the situation to obtain prosperity.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP !! Which of the following is a way in which Jackie Robinson changed sports? More minority members found success in p
    10·2 answers
  • Which aspect of U.S. politics is most closely tired to the concept of direct democracy?
    10·1 answer
  • Which European countries explored and colonized in the Americas?
    15·2 answers
  • An argument made by anti-imperialists in the late 1800’s was that the united states:
    5·1 answer
  • How did the immigrants, rising in number after the 1880s, differ in ethnic background and economic status from most of the earli
    7·1 answer
  • What did the delta of the Nile river provide Egyptians in Acient Egyptian History
    12·2 answers
  • What is the primary purpose of a political action committee? to increase awareness of a particular political issue to organize e
    9·1 answer
  • Question 4 please! &lt;3
    9·1 answer
  • Which describes a nomad?
    14·2 answers
  • Who created the Universal Declaration of Human Rights?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!