The Dred Scott vs. Sandford case was monumental in America, as it stated that slaves had no rights which their owners were bound to respect. Along with this, it also stated that slaves are property and can be brought into free states.
This case causes significant divide between the nation. The southern states and those individuals with slaves see this as a victory, as they can now take their slaves wherever they want without the fear of these individuals becoming free men. On the other hand, abolitionists and states who outlawed slavery are furious. This is because they now have to allow slave owners to keep their slaves in a state where they do not want slavery. This case resulted in a bigger divide between those for slavery and those against slavery.
Answer:
The United States should guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, they shall also protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, of the Executive when the Legislature cannot be convened against domestic Violence.
<span>The answer is C- Maintaining an individual and racial identity does not mean all people cannot work together. When he says, "we can be as separate as the fingers," he means that we can all be individuals with regard to our social characteristics, just as fingers can move independently of one another. However, as all fingers are attached to a hand, they are required to act as one unit for the progress of the group as a whole.</span>
Well there isn't a table but I can briefly explain this:
France - When ruled by kings, the people went to war out of loyalty to their king. Under Napoleon Bonaparte, people went to war on the beliefs of French principles.
Germany - All German-speaking parts of Europe constitute one nationality should be one state. They pursued their goals forcefully (no one trying to stop them) and captured the German part of Czechoslovakia. (Nazi's)
I hope this helps.
Answer:
i picked answer D hope it's right
Explanation:
