The correct answer is the third option. In contrast of what philosophers stated at the time, Machiavelli argued that a ruler should do whatever he could in order to achieve the state's goals. This continues to be a highly controversial posture till this day because it clashes with ethical principles. Machiavelli's statement implies that a ruler can potentially incur in wrongdoings in order to get things done.
Answer:
Stephen F, Austin was a well respected citizen among Texans. His success as an empressario gave him great credibility and his political policies were generally well received. Austin also had a great deal of experience and success negotiating relations between Anglo settlers and the Mexican government. The Texas delegates probably felt Austin’s relationship with Mexico would offer the greatest chance for success. They may have anticipated resistance, but probably did not expect Austin to be arrested.
Explanation:
that is the possible answer on edge
Answer:
Thomas Paine was a severe critic of the English Constitution. Three components that needed revision, according to him, were:
One, the continuation of the monarchy is the continuation of a tyrannical government; Paines advocate the natural rights of man, all men are born equal and there are no natural rulers. Two, the Peers are a tyrannical, aristocratic institution. Three, for him, there was no real separation of powers in Britain, no real checks and balances.
Explanation:
