Explanation:
Terrorist attack is the violence caused or people killed by militant group or terrorist group in order to break the national harmony. It is one f the most important global problem that needs to be tackled.
Some of the potential target site of any terrorist attack in California are --
- Amusement parks
- All telecommunications towers
- Sewage treatment plants
- Electrical power generation and also transmission facilities
- Energy grid
All of the above sites are declared as "critical infrastructure" in the Patriot Act of 2001 of the United States and any destruction to any of these structures may impact the national security and economy of the country.
In my opinion it’s not excusable.
Answer:
To mobilize a nation. Inexpensive, accessible, and ever-present, the poster was an ideal agent for making war aims the personal mission of every citizen
Explanation:
Answer:
Greek city-states developed different forms of governance with very different political structures and strengths.
Greek colonization led to the spread of the Greek language and Greek culture, but it also resulted in tensions with the neighboring Persian empire, culminating in the Persian Wars.
Athens developed democratic institutions and a culture of philosophy, science, and culture; it emerged as a powerful state and allied with other city-states, forming the Delian League.
Resistance to Athens’ power among the other Greek city-states, particularly Sparta, prompted the Peloponnesian War.
Explanation:
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
