1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fed [463]
3 years ago
7

How did the Great War affect life on the home front? *

History
1 answer:
Lostsunrise [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Essential items needed for the war effort were rationed

You might be interested in
in opposition to the declaration of war against Mexico, what did first term u.s congressman Abraham Lincoln demand to be shown?
Vilka [71]
<span>Elected as a Whig to Congress in 1846, Abraham Lincoln gained notoriety when he lashed out against the Mexican War, calling it immoral, proslavery, and a threat to the nation's republican values. President James K. Polk had called for war, accusing Mexico of shedding of "American blood on American soil.” Lincoln responded by introducing a series of resolutions demanding to know the "particular spot of soil on which the blood of our citizens was so shed." One of Lincoln's constituents branded him "the Benedict Arnold of our district," and he was denied renomination by his own party.
Document: Whereas the President of the United States, in his message of May 11, 1846, has declared that "the Mexican Government not only refused to receive him, [the envoy of the United States,] or listen to his propositions, but, after a long-continued series of menaces, has at last invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soil:" And again, in his message of December 8, 1846, that "we had ample cause of war against Mexico long before the breaking out of hostilities; but even then we forbore to take redress into our own hands until Mexico herself became the aggressor, by invading our soil in hostile array, and shedding the blood of our citizens:" And yet again, in his message of December 7, 1847, that "the Mexican Government refused even to hear the terms of adjustment which he [our minister of peace] was authorized to propose, and finally, under wholly unjustifiable pretexts, involved the two countries in war, by invading the territory of the State of Texas, striking the first blow, and shedding the blood of our citizens on our own soil." And whereas this House is desirous to obtain a full knowledge of all the facts which go to establish whether the particular spot on which the blood of our citizens was so shed was or was not at that time our own soil: Therefore, Resolved By the House of Representatives, That the President of the United States be respectfully requested to inform this House --1st. Whether the spot on which the blood of our citizens was shed, as in his messages declared, was or was not within the territory of Spain, at least after the treaty of 1819, until the Mexican revolution.2d. Whether that spot is or is not within the territory which was wrested from Spain by the revolutionary Government of Mexico.3d. Whether that spot is or is not within a settlement of people, which settlement has existed ever since long before the Texas revolution, and until its inhabitants fled before the approach of the United States army.4th. Whether that settlement is or is not isolated from any and all other settlements by the Gulf and the Rio Grande on the south and west, and by wide uninhabited regions on the north and east.5th. Whether the people of that settlement, or a majority of them, or any of them, have ever submitted themselves to the government or laws of Texas or the United States, by consent or compulsion, either by accepting office, or voting at elections, or paying tax, or serving on juries, or having process served upon them, or in any other way.6th. Whether the people of that settlement did or did not flee from the approach of the United States army, leaving unprotected their homes and their growing crops, before the blood was shed, as in the messages stated; and whether the first blood, so shed, was or was not shed within the enclosure of one of the people who had thus fled from it.7th. Whether our citizens, whose blood was shed, as in his message declared, were or were not, at that time, armed officers and soldiers, sent into that settlement by the military order of the President, through the Secretary of War.8th. Whether the military force of the United States was or was not sent into that settlement after General Taylor had more than once intimated to the War Department that, in his opinion, no such movement was necessary to the defence or protection of Texas.Source: Abraham Lincoln, “Spot Resolutions,” December 22, 1847Copyright 2016 Digital History         

this is the site i got it from does this help you or no?



</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Ancient Greeks used myths about their gods primarily to -
iVinArrow [24]

Answer:

Cast belief

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the chart illustrate about American Indian populations:
BabaBlast [244]
The answer is B. Hope it helps
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What would a loyal British Royal Government official in America probably have said in July of 1776?
posledela
1776 was the year that the Americans declared independence from Britain. Aka, the Americans adoption of the Declaration of Independence. Guiding from that, a loyalist of Britain more than likely would more than likely not feel overly safe within America, hence they probably would've spoken I have to get on the next boat back to England. 
8 0
3 years ago
Explain The controversy surrounding the US patriot act
NISA [10]

The US Patriot Act has one big controversy about it. It is the part of it where it states ''other purposes''. While the rest of the act is specifically focused on certain things, the part ''other purposes'' is not specific, and it opens up the door for actions that are not against terrorism. It has been argued that this part of the act is actually enabling the US authorities to act against alleged future criminal activities, and treat the people that they suspect that may do a criminal activity in the future as criminals, despite them having done anything against the law, and using a method that is not a sure indicator by any means.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Was the Declaration of Independence intended to be a formal declaration of war? Why or why not?
    6·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the idea of true womanhood that dictated the roll of women in the 1800s?
    7·1 answer
  • Unlike portuguese explorers, columbus believed that he could get to asia more quickly by sailing
    15·2 answers
  • What city in the mongol empire was conquered four years after khanbalik (beijing) was conquered?
    5·2 answers
  • What was 1 of Joe Biden's major points?
    13·2 answers
  • Which is the correct order of events that occured after Austria-hungary declared war on serbia?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these events happened first in English history? A. King John signed the Magna Carta. B. Parliament divided into two hou
    10·1 answer
  • This term can mean a walled-off section of a city meant to house people of a specific religious, ethnic, or racial group (is in
    11·1 answer
  • but Cyclops went on filling up his belly with manflesh and great gulps of whey, then lay down like a mast among his sheep. What
    14·2 answers
  • Identify the statements that best reflect the political realities of the concept of<br> "deference."
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!