1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luda [366]
3 years ago
9

Industrialization resulted in what changes to American society?

History
1 answer:
s2008m [1.1K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The industrial and economic developments of the Industrial Revolution brought significant social changes. Industrialization resulted in an increase in population and the phenomenon of urbanization, as a growing number of people moved to urban centres in search of employment.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The "long march" of china was led by
Alexxandr [17]
The "long march" of China was led by Mao Zedong so its C.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The authors of the "Preliminary Statement of the Association of Manhattan District Scientists" mention the “grave danger that li
DIA [1.3K]

Answer:

The "grave danger" that the author is talking about is the danger of atomic weaponry

Explanation:

"Preliminary Statement of the Association of Manhattan District Scientists" was a 100-page report written after the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The "grave danger" that the scientist is talking about in the article is the dangers of atomic weaponry. The article talks about the consequences that wrong decisions of leaders may have on its nations.

5 0
3 years ago
Who invaded England before William the conqueror?
posledela

Answer:I think it was Harold Godwinson

Explanation:

Harold Godwinson defeated the invaders and killed Harald III of Norway and Tostig at the Battle of Stamford Bridge. On 28 September 1066, William of Normandy invaded England in a campaign called the Norman Conquest.

7 0
4 years ago
How did the arms race affect the US foreign policy<br><br> PLEASE HELP!!
Bond [772]

Answer:

I hope it helps u.

Explanation:

Arms races have generated a great deal of interest for a variety of reasons. They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security, but agreement stops there. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations. The opposing view holds that engaging in an arms race is often a state's best option for avoiding war when faced with an aggressive adversary. Debate over the causes of arms races is just as divided. One school believes that arms races are primarily rational responses to external threats and opportunities, whereas arms race skeptics believe that arms buildups are usually the product of a mixture of internal, domestic interests, including those of the scientists involved in research and development (R&D), the major producers of weapons systems, and the military services that will operate them. The policy implications of these contending views are equally contradictory; critics see arms control as a way to reduce the probability of war and rein in domestic interests that are distorting the state's security policy, and proponents argue that military competition is most likely to protect the state's international interests and preserve peace.

Arms buildups and arms races also play a prominent role in international relations (IR) theory. Building up arms is one of a state's three basic options for acquiring the military capabilities it requires to achieve its international goals; the other two are gaining allies and cooperating with its adversary to reduce threats. In broad terms, choosing between more competitive and more cooperative combinations of these options is among the most basic decisions a state must make, and it is often the most important.

Mark me as brainlist answer,

Have a nice day,

Thank you ☺

8 0
3 years ago
I know the answer to this question, but can somebody explain to me why its not A document sent to New World miners by a Spanish
coldgirl [10]

Answer:

A journal written by Christopher Columbus on one of his voyages

Explanation:

A primary source document is a document that was written by a person who experienced an event first hand, while a secondary source document on the other hand, is a document that was written by someone who did not experience the event first hand.

The correct answer is option C because Columbus experienced the discovery of the New World first-hand.

The answer is not D because a document sent to New World miners by a Spanish official is a secondary source document.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 2. Which of the following is not a way that historians study prehistoric sub-Sahar
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the views of Voltaire the outspoken French philosopher of enlightenment?
    14·1 answer
  • What is manifest destiny? <br> Write it in your own words and dont get of, of google or any website
    15·2 answers
  • The Toumai fossil is estimated to be __________.
    10·1 answer
  • Which phrase best defines the term “opportunity costs”?
    10·1 answer
  • Life in the Middle Colonies was<br> A. very busy<br> B. chaotic<br> C. expensive
    6·2 answers
  • After the Cherokee leaders vowed to keep their Nation
    8·1 answer
  • Paragraph on propaganda to influence Nazis polices​
    12·1 answer
  • How were the terms of the Fourteen Points and the Treaty of Versailles different?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!