The answer is that "it is reinforced based on a <span>fixed-interval schedule".
</span>
A Fixed Interval Schedule gives a reward at reliable circumstances. For example a kid might be rewarded once per week if their room is tidied up. A problem with this sort of fortification timetable is that people tend to hold up until the point that the time when support will happen and then begin their reactions. Due to this reinforcement, yield doesn't stay steady. For example, Educator plans exams or undertakings at general interims and the grade is the reinforced, yet the work is inconsistent during the interim between tests.
Answer:
Fiscal federalism.
Explanation:
In the federal system of governance, <em>fiscal federalism</em> is <em>used to allocate competencies and fiscal instruments to the different layers of administration</em>. For example, by means of <u>grants </u><u>higher levels of governments share countries resources with the lower level of governance</u>. Such allocation can be unconditional and conditional. Conditional allocations vary both in time and geography. Say, a particular state required grant to promote drug education in classrooms in 2017, but the situation improved and it does not need it anymore.
Answer: the GOP(Grand old party)
Explanation:
The Republican Party, also referred to as the GOP (‘Grand old party’), is one of the world's oldest extant political parties. It is the second-oldest existing political party in the United States; its chief rival, the Democratic Party, is the oldest.
Answer:
For not receiving any financial help from the grantees, senator Kauffman hands were not tied neither was he unburdened or pressured by the outside forces to undermine the white collar crime investigations.
Step-by-step explanation
In the US the elites that is the political class, bankers and the individual funders do have influence over the State representatives due to their huge donations used in campaigns. In this case Senator Kaufman did not campaign but rather was appointed hence he did not receive any financial help from any third party, therefore his only commitment was to deliver the work he was appointed for.
This differs from other leaders because their allegiance is swayed as they try to please their donors for example; elected officials who received donations from NRA went against the bills that would limit their access to particular weapons.