<em>Banksys' plan to sell anything as "art" is pure genius, as Banksy is a firm believer in not placing a price on art. Therefore his act was out of art, not vandalism because he was trying to get his point across the board. Although he didn't make his point clear due to the art selling for even more after self-destructing. Banksy makes street art and putting a price on his art to destroy it was the most modernly artistic thing an artist could do nowadays. Everyone is pricing their art for millions, while Banksy is making his free for the people to appreciate.</em>
The word Actually is an example of an adverb
<span>True, after getting a marriage in a family which results expansion of the members. It is not by the way of adding two people but by other relatives belong to the couple also added as a family. Or also a family can include people by its own choice because a family can afford an orphan or like these people as a choice and it depends on the attitude of the particular family.</span>
I think it would be likely. Britain is a country that is well-developed and has a decent military. If you are referring to war in London or other big cities, I think the armies would try to keep warfare on the battlefield, not urban areas. However, to counter that, (correct me if I'm wrong), I believe London is on the water, so a type of naval invasion would be likely. It also depends on who the fighters are. Britain v. U.S.A. for example, evacuations of cities would begin, and it's likely we'd see another Refugee Crisis like the one happening now in Europe, but smaller. But the U.K is part of the U.N., a huge group of unified countries. If war were to break out, it's likely forces would be pushed out easily with the help of other powers/countries.
