The answer is <span>charge bargaining
This type of bargain is usually being made if a defendant posess a certain information that wanted by the prosecutor, so they made a deal that beneficial for both of them.
For example, a drug seller that exchange the reduction of his sentence with information regarding his drug supplier.</span>
Martin sostre is known as the<span> "father of the modern prisoners' rights movement" because of his lifetime achievement.
He was an activist that arrested through fabricated evidences and sentenced for 41 years in prison. In that place, he became jailhouse lawyers that help prisoners winning many cases on inhumane treatment in prisons (such as inhumane treatment for solidary confinement)</span>
All of the given options would shift aggregate demand to the right by more than the increase in expenditures.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
When an economy is at rest than the state is termed as equilibrium but multiplier effect is seen when primary variation in collective demand can have bigger impact on equilibrium level of national income.
Multiplier effect is of two type positive (when primary hike in an injection result into greater final hike in real GDP) and negative (when primary decline in an injection result into greater final decline in real GDP). Here all the options can shift the aggregate demand to the right by more than increase in expenditure and show positive multiplier effect.
Answer:
a. Went on crusades , built churches , and collected holy relics
In Schenck v. the United States (1919), the Supreme Court ruled that criticism of the draft was NOT protected by the First Amendment, because it created a clear and present danger to American interests.
- In the Schenk v. US case, which concerns the freedom of speech issue, Schenk urged Americans to forgo the World War I draft.
- The Supreme Court concluded in Schenck v. the United States that the First Amendment did not apply to criticism of the draft because it posed a clear and present danger to American interests.
- The U.S. Supreme Court heard a First Amendment challenge to federal legislation on free speech grounds for the first time in this case.
Learn about more Supreme Court here
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
