A significant factor was the general recession in the years following the 2007 housing bubble popping. People lost jobs, were struggling to pay bills, and naturally it was not an ideal time to purchase a vehicle.
Another significant factor was the surge in oil prices that came with the economic crisis, and the increased costs that automobile manufacturers faced due to the credit crunch that also came with the crisis. Since a lot of US manufacturers at the time were selling big SUV's, such as Hummers, as their most profitable products, the steep fall in demand hurt the industry immensely. At the time, US auto manufactures didn't offer many fuel-efficient, inexpensive alternatives to choose from.
The government chose to bail out major US automotive companies, providing large loans in order to help them stay solvent and keep their stock price from tanking. The results were generally positive. Big auto-manufacturers, apart from a couple mergers, survived and were given time to adapt the new market for fuel-efficient, less expensive vehicles.
I would tell the Michigan Economic Council to adapt ahead and to urge companies to diversify their product line. A major factor that automotive manufacturers can definitely take the blame for is their over-reliance on the sales of expensive SUV's, when oil prices and general market trends suggested that the future was not with these vehicles.
The democracy in place in Rome was considered: indirect, meaning that people selected their leaders
The word 'indirect' and 'direct' within a democratic system represent the role that the people take in the creation of legislation.
In direct democracy, the people choose the type of legislation that they want. In indirect democracy, people can only choose their leaders and trusted these leaders to create legislation that benefit them, and this is the one that was used by the roman.
War was fought on multiple fronts
The key ideas of "The Prince" were about power and how leaders specifically princes could seek to gain power and also how they could go about maintaining power. These ideas helped to influence European rulers and individuals around the world by promoting this particular type of leadership and power seeking.
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no se anexan opciones o incisos para responder, podemos decir lo siguiente.
Una diferencia clave entre las primeras obras de la historia, como la odisea de Homero y las obras modernas de la historia es la inclusión de elementos mitológicos en los relatos.
Sí, la mitología juega un papel preponderante en la historia antigua, sobre todo de las primeras civilizaciones en el planeta, como lo es el caso de la civilización Sumeria. la antigua civilización Egipcia, la civilización de Harapa en el Valle del Indo, y por su puesto, posteriores civilizaciones como la antigua Grecia y la antigua Roma.
Las obras modernas de la historia no están basadas en la mitología, sino en la investigación y la recolección de datos de fuentes primarias y fuentes secundarias para ofrecer veracidad en los resultados de la investigación. En las obras modernas de historia la exactitud de las fechas, los personajes y los eventos, juegan un papel preponderante en la veracidad de los relatos históricos.
