Answer:
The book contains photocopies of Jefferson’s original letters. Not only are these letters Jefferson’s actual words, but the copies also present his words in his own handwriting. While the page isn’t the actual letter, Jacob is quoting Jefferson’s actual words and thoughts. Therefore, the book is a primary source document.
Explanation:
Two circumstances fits with the question:
1 - if the chapter's authors based their conclusions on their analysis of primary sources related to the Russian Revolution of 1917
2 - if that chapter were being read to understand how American educators taught Russian history in the 1960s.
The 1960s in America were a confusing period under the shadow of the Cold War. The United States and the Soviet Union were fighting ideologically to prove which system - Capitalism or Communism - was the best. Each side attempted to show the problems and mistakes of each economic system, sometimes almost reaching to fight fiscally. Because of all these misunderstandings and attacks of both sides, it's necessary to be careful with all the material produced at that time, especially a textbook, because the content can be tendencious, and mislead the reader. We ONLY could consider this textbook relevant if the authors were correct on their sources, writing based on researches, and if this textbook would be used to understand how Russian history was taught in the 1960s. Because one way or another, this textbook is outdated a lot!
The true answer would be C
In a way, Marlowe's Dr. Faustus is both an epitome and a subversion of the Renaissance Man. Having broken free of the medieval rule of theology, he unleashed curiosity and wanted to learn more about the world. Dogma is still strong, but the urges and impulses to challenge it are even stronger. Just like protestants challenged traditional Catholic dogma, and Calvinists challenged Lutherans with the idea of predestination, Dr. Faustus challenges traditional human aspiration to be good, do good, and end up in heaven as a reward. He turns this notion upside down, presuming that there is no way he would be able to end up in heaven.
So, Dr. Faustus is an embodiment of curiosity gone wild. His blase attitude towards humanistic science is, however, some kind of a scientific decadence: he casts away philosophy and law, to embrace magic, as a relic of medieval obsession over mysticism. In this regard, he is a subversion of the Renaissance Man. He thinks he has already learned all there was to learn about this world, so now he yearns for another kind of knowledge - esoteric, otherworldly, knowledge that isn't exactly a knowledge because you don't have to study long and hard for it, you just have to sell your soul to Lucifer.
The Renaissance was torn between two concepts: of a scholar, turned to nature, the globe, the world, and of a religious person who still can't come to terms with the God and the church. Dr. Faustus transcends both of these concepts: he is a scholar who betrays his profession, and a religious person who devotes to Satan, believing (not knowing!) that he has no chance whatsoever to be forgiven for his sins.
In this regard, the play doesn't criticize or support the idea of the Renaissance Man. It simply tries to come to term with the philosophical issues and conflicts of its own time.
You can divide the top and bottom by 3 to make 11/12. 11 cannot be broken down anymore so that is the simplest form
Answer:can you post a picture of this? whats the sentence
Explanation:
