1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
-Dominant- [34]
3 years ago
8

this court case ruled that the government could only punish the advocacy of illegal action if it directly incited lawless action

s
Law
1 answer:
expeople1 [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

<u><em>Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case, interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.</em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Based on our studies and understanding of the constitution as well as the principles from which it was founded on, Do you believ
KiRa [710]

Answer:

I think that the constitution outlined the very basic and general rights of the people at that time. Many things have changed since the constitution came into effect in 1789. I believe that the US has lived up to the ideas written and even exceeded it with the additional rights written throughout the years since then. (these rights being included in the bill of rights)

Explanation:

Note: I am not saying that the US has even close to the perfect government and there are a lot of things wrong with it. I am just stating a brief answer based on the content i have learned in my government class and answers they want to here in order for you to do well on the question. Hope this helps!

4 0
4 years ago
A country with a strong economy wants to take advantage of global market
Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

bc

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why should I study Case Law as an educator?
Serga [27]
I think that is a personal question and you need to answer it yourself
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An attorney is the managing partner at a small law firm. The attorney believes that technology will be increasingly important in
Marrrta [24]

Answer:

No the attorney is not subject to discipline because D) No, because the attorney reasonably believes that the year-end profit sharing plan is necessary in order to attract top talent and deliver competent services to clients.

Explanation:

Without having the best and the brightest there will be no profit to share at the end of the year. So the profit should be shared among all those that contributed no matter how little it is for the success of the cases. And also the profit being shared will serve as a motivation for the strategist to continue giving his best to the firm.

3 0
3 years ago
Should Jennifer be made to go to school, if the money she makes working helps support her family? A 13-year-old who works is a v
polet [3.4K]

Answer:Some families have no choice because they need to go to work.

Explanation:

!/3 of parents in 3 states may not send their children to school.

- Michigan

- Ohio

- Illinois

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Virtual Assistant avatar
    5·1 answer
  • Among other skills and attributes, attorneys should excel in critical thinking skills; communication skills such as listening, r
    12·1 answer
  • What are financial duties
    10·1 answer
  • An arrow signal with a left-pointing arrow _____.
    13·1 answer
  • What is it called when citizens give up there rights but get back protection from government?
    6·2 answers
  • What is a Good Samaritan policy in relation to alcohol abuse
    12·1 answer
  • What is a rebuttal?
    5·2 answers
  • Describe the experience of being a criminal defendant.
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be considered a reasonable accommodation for
    7·1 answer
  • How is law important to you as a student and a filipino citizen?​
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!