1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
-Dominant- [34]
3 years ago
8

this court case ruled that the government could only punish the advocacy of illegal action if it directly incited lawless action

s
Law
1 answer:
expeople1 [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

<u><em>Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case, interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.</em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Imagine a 28-year-old man named Keith is about to be released from prison after serving a seven-year sentence. Keith is not sure
sammy [17]

Answer:

A Place to stay

Explanation:

First he needs to find a place to stay as a homeless shelter if he has money in his bank he can rent an appartement or a hotel just till he can find a job if he dose not have money he can go to a homeless shelter.

5 0
3 years ago
What is different about these two situations?
vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

Incomplete Question

Explanation:

Maybe add an image or something that refers to the question:)

8 0
3 years ago
To take the Special Point Examination, you can register online or call the DMV. True or False​
ss7ja [257]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Because you can register online for free

6 0
3 years ago
Sitting prosecutors give much attention to quality recommendations. Why? Name three reasons for this in approximately 150 words.
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

As used in these standards, “prosecutor” means any attorney, regardless of agency, title, or full or part-time assignment, who acts as an attorney to investigate or prosecute criminal cases or who provides legal advice regarding a criminal matter to government lawyers, agents, or offices participating in the investigation or prosecution of criminal cases. These Standards are intended to apply in any context in which a lawyer would reasonably understand that a criminal prosecution could result.

These Standards are intended to provide guidance for the professional conduct and performance of prosecutors. They are written and intended to be entirely consistent with the ABA’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct, and are not intended to modify a prosecutor's obligations under applicable rules, statutes, or the constitution. They are aspirational or describe “best practices,” and are not intended to serve as the basis for the imposition of professional discipline, to create substantive or procedural rights for accused or convicted persons, to create a standard of care for civil liability, or to serve as a predicate for a motion to suppress evidence or dismiss a charge. For purposes of consistency, these Standards sometimes include language taken from the Model Rules of Professional Conduct; but the Standards often address conduct or provide details beyond that governed by the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. No inconsistency is ever intended; and in any case a lawyer should always read and comply with the rules of professional conduct and other authorities that are binding in the specific jurisdiction or matter, including choice of law principles that may regulate the lawyer’s ethical conduct.

Because the Standards for Criminal Justice are aspirational, the words “should” or “should not” are used in these Standards, rather than mandatory phrases such as “shall” or “shall not,” to describe the conduct of lawyers that is expected or recommended under these Standards. The Standards are not intended to suggest any lesser standard of conduct than may be required by applicable mandatory rules, statutes, or other binding authorities.

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/ProsecutionFunctionFourthEdition/ for more info

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Describe the difference between an Infraction, Felony, and Misdemeanor?
ikadub [295]
An infraction is a violation of an agreement, a misdemeanor is a minor wrongdoing, and a felony is a real crime(typically violent)
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Justice Dhoni is a prominent judge and the Chief Justice of the Bombay High court. He is due for retirement in a few months time
    6·1 answer
  • What are 3 ways in which a legal duty to act arises?​
    13·1 answer
  • Are Native Americans considered North American citizens?
    12·2 answers
  • The Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Group of answer choices reaffirmed the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson
    15·1 answer
  • According to John F. Galliher, legal definitions of criminality are arrived at through a __________ process.
    13·1 answer
  • La igualdad y equidad son lo mismo
    6·1 answer
  • What would have happened if Malala didnt<br>fight for education rights ? ​
    5·1 answer
  • Qasffffffffsafaasfsfsfsf
    8·2 answers
  • How minority and majority be beneficial economically in a country
    11·1 answer
  • If a crime is committed and a person serves three years for it, what type of crime was it?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!