Answer:
the correct answer is A
Explanation:
murder is punished by law.
The answer is B.
Saddam Hussein was the Leader of Iraq in 2003 until he was sentenced to death by hanging, after being found guilty and convicted of crimes against humanity by the Iraqi Special Tribunal for the murder of 148 Iraqi Shi'ites in the town of Dujail in 1982, in retaliation for an assassination attempt against him.
The Answer for your second question is A.
Iraq invaded Kuwait...
UN, NATO, and United States forces responded by attacking and pushing Iraqi troops out of Kuwait. The war was a decisive victory for American and coalition forces.
<u>Answer:</u>
The public planning of many lynchings in the South showed that police were not interested in stopping violence.
Option: (B)
<u>Explanation:</u>
- The lynchings that happened in the south have always been believed to have happened due to the deliberate ignorance of the Police and the other responsible authorities.
- The prejudice beard by the majority white population of the south against the blacks of the south kept on out-springing in violent unrest in between the groups of these two.
- The sparks of violence were aired to become rages of fire due to the ignorance of the Police as the police too were predominantly against the blacks.
Globalization must be expected to influence the distribution of income as well as its level. So far as the distribution of income between countries is concerned, standard theory would lead one to expect that all countries will benefit. Economists have long preached that trade is mutually beneficial, and most of us believe that the experience of widespread growth alongside rapidly growing trade in the postwar period serves to substantiate that. Similarly most FDI goes where a multinational has intellectual capital that can contribute something to the local economy, and is therefore likely to be mutually beneficial to investor and recipient. And a flow of capital that finances a real investment is again likely to benefit both parties, since the yield on the investment is expected to be higher than the rate of interest the borrower has to pay, while that rate of interest is also likely to be higher than the lender could expect at home since otherwise there would have been no incentive to send it abroad. Loose talk about free trade making the rich countries richer and poor countries poorer finds no support in economic analysis.
