Answer:
D. ability to make major changes in a short period of time
Explanation:
While other options are can be true of a command economy in certain situations, option D is the only option that I would classify as an advantage of a command economy over a Market Economic System. However, major changes in a short time can have disastrous consequences, for example the 6-7 million deaths that resulted from Stalin's five year plan.
Northwestern Europe but mainly the German Irish
I’m not sure, but this should help you a little bit.
“The Immigration and Nationality Services of Act of 1965 was a turning point in United States policy regarding immigration. While changing previous legislation that functioned on a rigid quota system, the Act of 1965 gave preference to refugees and families, removed quotas from countries in the Western Hemisphere, and based entry to the United States on levels of skill. In forty years since, the foreign-born population of the United States has tripled in number, now prompting new legislative debate.”
Answer:
Explanation:
Hitler appointed Hjalmar Schacht as President of the Reichsbank in 1933 and Minister of Economics in 1934. He created a bunch of public works programs which were supported by deficit spending. But then Hjalmar Schacht created a scheme for deficit financing, so capital projects were paid for with the issuance of promissory notes called "Mefo bills" and because "Mefo bills" wasn't Germany's official currency so it didn't show on their federal budget. But then that fell through, and the government basically made banks buy federal bonds so the German government could pay back the "Mefo bills". But Schacht achieved a rapid decline in the unemployment rate, the largest of any country during the Great Depression because of his public works and by 1938, unemployment was basically non-extinct.
