Answer:
The answer is:
Total loss to the left of the intersection
Total profit to the right of the intersection
Explanation:
Cost-volume-profit (CVP) analysis is a method that looks into the impact of how varying levels of costs and volume will affect the operating profit of a firm. This gives companies good understanding of the profitability of their products or services.
To answer the question above;
Total loss to the left of the intersection
Total profit to the right of the intersection
While the intersection is the break-even
Answer:
Mar 17.
6150 Bad Debt Expense $1.000 - Debit
1010 CASH Operating Account $275 - Debit
1290 A/REC Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts $1.000 - Credit
1220 A/REC Trade Notes Receivable $275 - Credit
Jul 29.
1290 A/REC Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts $1.000 - Debit
1010 CASH Operating Account $1.000 - Debit
6150 Bad Debt Expense $1.000 - Credit
1220 A/REC Trade Notes Receivable $1.000 - Credit
Explanation:
Answer:
The slope of the total output curve at the relevant point.
Explanation:
A marginal physical product can be defined as the extra output which is being generated by using an extra input. This ultimately implies that, marginal physical product of labor refers to the change in the level of output that is generated from using an additional unit of labor.
Mathematically, marginal physical product of labor is given by the formula;
Marginal physical product of labor = ΔY/ΔL
Where, ΔY is the change in total physical output.
ΔL is the change in labor.
In the short run, when the number of workers are increased it would result in a diminishing marginal product with respect to the law of diminishing marginal returns.
The marginal physical product of labor is the slope of the total output curve at the relevant point.
<em>For instance, if brainly producing 50 answers decides to employ one more tutor and is then able to produce 55 answers, the marginal physical product of labor is simply 5. </em>
Answer and Explanation:
I will go through each and every option explaining the reasons and what option would be the best:
The (a) part says 'difference in wages will eventually disappear since a haircut is a homogeneous good' - This is not true because even though it is an homogeneous product, some customers do have a strong preference for barbers who are not going bald. Therefore, they know their worth and they would want to capitalize on that and get paid just a bit more than bald barbers.
The (b) part says 'barbershops that hire barbers with hair will be able to charge a higher price for a haircut to those consumers who have a strong preference for barbers with hair'. - If the barbershop charges higher price for barbers that have hair then the customers will prefer bald barbers as the questions mentions that there is high competition and since it is an homogeneous, customers would be willing to save money and get their haircut from some other barber.
The (c) part says 'barbershops that hire bald barbers will always be much more profitable' - Not necessarily. The reason is that some customers have a strong preference for barbers who are not bald and therefore, that would help barbershops who have barbers with hair to be a bit more profitable as some additional customers would want their services.
The (d) part says 'barbershops that hire barbers with hair will always be much more profitable' - This is the best option and the reason for it is because some customers have a strong preference for barbers with hair and that would help the barbershop to earn more. They would have the customers who already indifferent to whoever cuts their hair and in addition to that, they would also have the customers who have their preference.
Hence the answer is D.
Answer:C.TINSTAAFL Rating
Explanation:
