A questionnaire item, distributed to a random sample of adults, reading "Are you not in support of nationalized health care", with a yes or no possible response, would violate the concept of "Avoid negative items."
Option d
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
While doing a research study the researcher has to formulate the questionnaire according to the field of research. In this type of questionnaire based data research, one has to give at most importance to the target audience whom the research is meant for.
To get better data from target group on has to develop a questionnaire which avoids the negative items because the target group should not be confused while giving their opinion.
So, before preparing a questionnaire one has to clearly study and understand the nature of group and their attitude towards the particular segment of research to avoid negative items.
<em>Hey There!!</em>
<em>I think the best answer is:</em>
<em>C. </em><em>Both regions exported mostly food products.</em>
<em>Because, They grew crops such as wheat, oats and barley. Similar to New England colonies, the Middle colonies also flourished in trade of major items like iron and furs. When comparing both New England and Middle Colonies, both utilized forms of self-government.</em>
<em>P.S </em><em>Tell me if this wrong....</em>
<em />
<em />
<em>#</em>
<em> </em>
<em />
<em>#</em>
<em> </em>
<em />
<em />
<em />
Answer: Decomposers get nutrients and energy by breaking down dead organisms and animal wastes. Through this process, decomposers release nutrients, such as carbon and nitrogen, back into the environment. These nutrients are recycled back into the ecosystem so that the producers can use them
Explanation:
Check numbers 1, 3, and 4
Answer:
The right option which is the best option to be taken by the Congress is to impeach the Supreme Court judges for their opinions which is option 3.
Explanation:
Removing someone from the Court would require an investigation and formal charges by the House Judiciary Committee, a majority vote in the House, a trial in the Senate, and a two-thirds majority.
This approach would need extremely compelling grounds for removal in order to gain support from more than 20 Republicans. As a practical matter, the House would need new information such as abuse of office, financial improprieties, or further evidence of sexual assault or perjury to provide the basis for removal, while the search for material would itself be easily criticized as partisan. .
