Answer:
I think Mac was talking about if they would treat the Japanese well, then they will not be looking for revenge. After World War 1, they treated the Germans really bad in the peace deal and France had ruthless occupation in the Rhineland of Germany. That why the NAZI party took power, people today wonder how can such people vote Hitler in and this is why. If they would treat the Japanese like how they treated the Germans after World War 1 , there would be no peace between the Japaneses and the Americans. America fought world war 2 not to bring japan horrific occupation but a occupation with justice.
Explanation:
The U.S had some Reconstruction plans that would save japan from a new dictatorship. Many people wanted japan to fall and have a ruthless occupation as revenge. What I mean by "ruthless" is take the wealth away from japan and as much of the land resources as possible for revenge. Mac Arthur knew this would not only cause unrest but revenge.
They traded.
And the Indians shared their land with them.
Impressment was a violation of neutral rights
The documents C and B may indeed be related to one another. So many invasions occurred. Another connection is that the soldiers abandoned their defense, which meant that they would not be able to repel the invaders.
- There is a correlation because losing protection would make it harder for the soldiers to defeat the invaders if there were several invasions.
- It's conceivable that Documents C and B are related because Document B claimed that because the soldiers were helpless and surrendered, fled and rendered their army hopeless, the adversaries would seize control and a populace invasion would fill the void. As a result, Document B serves as both a justification for Rome's demise and evidence in Document C, which also depicts the invasion.
- The two documents are related to one another. They are related since they both involve the military. The reasons why the military disintegrated are discussed in document B. The invasion of Rome by the six tribes is discussed in document C. If the army hadn't disintegrated, the tribes wouldn't have been able to attack.
- This is due to the fact that documents B and C describe Rome's decline as a result of the invaders. It is explained in document B how the troops weakened themselves, and it is shown in document C together with a map of the empires that invaded Rome. My proof is found in B, where it states, "But when, due to carelessness and sloth, round drills were abandoned. This proof demonstrates the soldiers' slackness. Rome's invasions are depicted in C with lines, names, and dates. This proof provided me with the solution.
- Given that they both compare how Rome's army declined, Document C and Document B may be related to one another. I discovered this information by looking through Doc B's search results and then observing how many different nations had attacked Doc C. When these sources discuss how many different nations Rome's soldiers faced without armor, they are compared.
To learn more about document C and document B visit:brainly.com/question/27215505
#SPJ9
Congress holds the power to declare war. As a result, the president cannot declare war without their approval. However, as the Commander in Chief of the armed forces, many presidents have sent troops to battle without an official war declaration Ex. Vietnam, Korea.
Hope its right
