Answer:
See below
Explanation:
June 37,600 - 2,300 = 35,300
July 17,200 - 600 = 16,600
If the price elasticity of demand for Mountain Dew is 4.4 then "mountain dew has a high price elasticity of demand".
<u>Answer:</u> Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
In economics "Price elasticity of demand" (PED) is a metric required to illustrate the flexibility or elasticity of a product or service's required quantity to increase its value when nothing but the value of product vary. When mountain dew have price elasticity of demand is 4.4 this follows that a price increase of 10 percent would result in the quantity needed decline by 44%
as illustrated below:
4.4 = (% quantity change) / (% price change)
4.4 = x / 10
x = -4.4 (10) = -44% here negative sign shows decline in quantity required.
Bob has to own his land for 18 years if the price is increasing at the rate of 6% per year.
Given that land was bought by Bob for $16390, the price is increasing at the rate of 6%, price of land today is $46817.
We are required to find the time for which Bob need to own the land so that the price of the land is $46817 today.
Compounding means calculating amount on the principal and the amount added interest.
Rate of increasing the price of land be 6%.
Price when Bob bought the land=$16390.
Price of land today=$46817.
It is like compounding of interest and the sum is calculated as under:
S=P*
In the above equation P is theamount at beginning,r is rate of increasing and n is the number of years.
46817=16390
46817/16390=
=2.8564
=
(Approximately)
From both the sides we will get n=18.
Hence Bob has to own his land for 18 years if the price is increasing at the rate of 6% per year.
Learn more about compounding at brainly.com/question/2449900
#SPJ4
The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.
<h3>What is a legal contract?</h3>
A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.
In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.
Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.
Learn more about a legal contract here:
brainly.com/question/3208041
#SPJ1
