Answer and Explanation:
If we have a scaffold under construction, we will have an environment with some risks that must be combated, through guidelines that protect not only workers, but also people who are possibly passing through the site.
The construction of the scaffold leaves the environment dangerous because it can present risks of slips and debris falls, electrocution risk, risks of poorly prepared structure, among others.
We can actually deduce here that the astronaut that raised his hand actually said that the colour of the feather placed on his helmet was blue and going further to give a logical explanation, he explained that this is because the sky of the planet where they are is blue.
<h3>What is logical explanation?</h3>
Logical explanation actually refers to the explanation that is given using logic and what everyone sees and knows. In logical reasoning, one speaks based on what he/she knows or acquires from reasoning or thinking through.
We see here that logically thinking, the helmet placed on their heads actually denoted sky and the blue feather denotes the colour of the sky. Remember they were told not to look up. That means what we are looking for is up which is the sky.
Thus, we can say here that the colour of the feather placed on his helmet is blue and it actually talks about the colour of their planet.
Learn more about logical reasoning on brainly.com/question/25175983
#SPJ1
Answer:
Because Grover was scaring him
Explanation:
ive read the book...lol
If we are to match the terms of the following logical fallacies with its definition, it would be:
A) The use of popular mass appeal to convince others that they should do/believe something because everyone else does/is
Bandwagon
B) The use of an extreme example that is highly unlikely to try to discredit the action or words of another
Strawman
C) The use of finger-pointing or name-calling to attack the person making the argument instead of the argument itself
Ad Hominem
D) The use of an argument's conclusion as a premise for proving the argument (assuming what it is attempting to prove)
Circular reasoning
E) A conclusion or reply that does not follow the previous statement in a logical manner
Non sequitur
F) The use of quick judgment that is not based on facts but instead on a very limited experience to what one is judging
Hasty generalization
<h3>What is Hasty Generalization?</h3>
This refers to the type of fallacy that is used when a person rushes into a hasty conclusion about a thing from incomplete facts, which is usually incorrect.
Hence, we can see that the correct matchings has been made above.
Read more about hasty generalization here:
brainly.com/question/2955537
#SPJ1
Horrified would be more dramatic in the sentence so its not horrified. Its not sad because there is no remorse. Its not embarrassed because there is no words expressing the feeling embarrassed. So your best bet is hesitant.
