1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MatroZZZ [7]
3 years ago
15

In the 1850s, most white northerners were not abolitionists and yet there was widespread opposition in the North to the Kansas-N

ebraska Act. Why?
History
1 answer:
sweet [91]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Kansas-Nebraska Act neutralized the Missouri Compromise. The Missouri compromise was responsible for slave-free accommodation.

Senator Stephen Douglas convinced Congress to permit the white males in an area to have the right to vote for slave or to be free from them. The people who voted in favor of slaves moved into areas that were free from slavery under the Missouri Compromise. The Settlers from the North settled in the Kansas Territory and were not interested in slave labor.

Although they were not abolitionists but they didn’t want any form of competition for land from slave holders who paid nothing to the slaves. All they wanted was a country with only whites and without black people or slavery.

You might be interested in
Expecting a country to live up to its values is called
Sonja [21]
This is called critical patriotism.
hope this helps!
4 0
3 years ago
What was the historical impact of jay’s treaty?
Radda [10]

Answer:

The treaty proved unpopular with the American public but did accomplish the goal of maintaining peace between the two nations and preserving U.S. neutrality. Tensions between the United States and Britain remained high after the Revolutionary War as a result of three key issues.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Before Washington, DC, what city was the nation’s capital?
Lyrx [107]
The answer is Philadelphia
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"Prithvi Narayan Shah was an expert and far sighted politician and successful administrator." Explain.​
Serjik [45]

Answer:

PNS personally commanded many battles. The battles taught him how to handle complex situations and how he could come out victorious.

PNS focused on his goal and used all means (Saam, Daam, Danda, Bhed) for his campaign. As he fought battles, he understood why integrating the nearby kingdoms could be beneficial against the rising British hegemony in the region. He also realized that the diversity of Nepal could be exploited by British to divide the kingdom.

Explanation:

Prithvi Narayan Shah was not a strategist in the beginning. As soon as he became the king of Gorkha, he wanted to capture Nuwakot. In 1800 B.S., the first troop he sent under Biraj Thapa could not cross the Trishuli River. PNS, however, was not satisfied with the delay and sent another troop under Maheshwar Panta. The Gorkhali troop lost to the nature (Trishuli) as well the soldiers of Nuwakot.

After the loss, PNS became a military strategist. He went Benaras, brought some weapons and trained his soldiers so that they obey all commands without fear. He also developed the Marwat system for helping the soldier’s family if he died in a battle. He also used Yogis, the devotees of Gorakhnath, as spies.

He did not know how to use geography to strategical advantage before he himself led the Second Battle of Nuwakot in 1801 B.S. Had Kalu Pandey not found a way to divert huge number of Nuwakote soldiers, PNS could have died in the battle.

He had already understood politics, though. Before the Second Battle of Nuwakot, PNS had realized that the Chaubise Rajyas could be threat to his campaign and he might have to kill his kins in Kaski, Lamjung and Tanahun. To avoid the “sins”, he changed his gotra from Bhardwaj to Kasyap.

He also understood that Nepal (the then Kathmandu Valley—Kantipur, Patan, and Bhaktapur) would be against him as soon as he captured Nuwakot. So he kept a cordial relation with Ranjit Malla of Bhaktapur, who was also his Meet Baa (best friend’s father/father’s best friend)

PNS used the anarchy established by the Pradhans to make his brother Dal Mardan Shah the king of Patan from 1820–1822. When PNS attacked Kirtipur in 1822, Dal Mardan Shah did not oppose even though the Pradhans had urged him to do so. On Poush 3, 1822, PNS won the third battle of Kirtipur. Less than four years later, PNS was the king of Nepal.

PNS also understood how the people of Nepal Mandal lived. When he won the surrounding areas, he imposed a complete economic blockade which was one of the biggest reasons behind his victory over Kantipur, Patan and Bhaktapur.

Through treaties and diplomatic understandings, he was able to solve a lot of problems with the Chaubises and Baises, the British, the Tibetan and the Newas.

7 0
3 years ago
Place the following events in sequence: A) Julius Caesar conquers Gaul; B) Caesar leads his army into Rome; C) Caesar revises th
butalik [34]
Cesar revises the Roman calendar is first then I’m pretty sure he lead his army into Rome and then he conquers Gaul If not then it’s Cesar revise is the Roman calendar then Julius Caesar conquers Gaul then Cesar leads his army into Rome
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Was new england the region of least economic growth in 18th century
    11·1 answer
  • For those who disobeyed the Church rulers, the biggest fear was
    11·1 answer
  • Why was the northern alliance important to us troops?
    14·1 answer
  • Truant officers came into use in the United States in the late 1800s. What's the role of a truant officer?
    7·2 answers
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 20 POITNS!!!!! PLZ HHHHHEEELLLLLLLLPPPPP!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • What did the United States gain from Pinckney's Treaty?​
    8·2 answers
  • Alexander Hamilton's long-term goal was to: Group of answer choices make the United States a major commercial and military power
    10·1 answer
  • What city is home to the longest suspension bridge in the u.s.?
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement best explains why the Tenth Amendment reserves some rights and powers to the states?
    14·2 answers
  • Why did countries form alliances? What was the purpose?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!