Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
You and your friend are both riding personal watercraft (pwc), and he is out in front of you. if he stops abruptly, you must: use the throttle to turn so as avoid a collision.
<h3>What is Watercraft?</h3>
Watercraft are vehicles that is ride on water.
Example of watercraft are:
- Ships
- Boats
- Hovercraft
- Submarines
Hence, if you and your friend are riding personal watercraft, and he is out in front of you. in a situation were he stops abruptly, you must use the throttle or acceleration to turn so as avoid a collision as throttle help to control speed while on motion.
Learn more about Watercraft here:brainly.com/question/24328357
#SPJ1
In the middle of israel and syria
<u>The federal government lagged behind the private sector in technological advancements because:</u>
- The federal government has made poor decisions in technology investments.
- The federal government has squandered hundreds of millions of dollars on costly IT projects.
Answer: Options A and D
<u>Explanation:</u>
The federal government invests hundreds of millions of dollars on costly IT projects and tops among organizations in the world. Now also the information exchanging form is out of date like mailing CDs, using outdated computer systems, etc but the government progressed in the 20th century by becoming both as benefactor and beneficiary of technology.
The major development of IBM hiked from government-led orders like the early mainframes during the Cold War was utilized by the defense department, the very first network resembling today’s Internet “ARPANET” funded by the defense department.
But the government also has been seen behaving sluggishly as said by the chairperson of the subcommittee on federal financial management named Sen.Thomas R. Carper who also conveyed that 100's of millions of dollars investment was poorly planned by federal government reasons were like inappropriate management of IT projects and followed IT investments which were photostat kind.
