It depends on your definition of hero, I guess. The fact that Gandhi and MLK did not use force to advocate for their opinions was mature and moral. They did not give up the first time. But maybe if the cause is correct, one might have to break the stated law, and become a hero.
Answer:
3. <em><u>They encouraged the spread of arts and education.</u></em>
5. <em><u>They provided financial support to artists.</u></em>
Explanation:
Edmentum.
Answer:
<em>Maintaining a legal and social framework, maintaining competition, providing public goods and services, redistributing income, correcting for externalities, and ensuring stability.</em>
Explanation:
<em>Maintaining a legal and social framework- creating laws and regulating trade, FDA, Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Reserve</em>
<em>Maintaining competition- antitrust laws, regulating natural monopolies</em>
<em>Providing public goods and services- national defense, sewer systems, basic radio and television, national parks, and emergency warning systems</em>
<em>Redistributing income- Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid</em>
<em>Correcting for externalities- taxing carbon emissions, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Environmental Protection Agency</em>
<em>Ensuring stability- Federal Reserve System</em>
This kind of organization was a type of one that would help the disabled people with what they needed help with. And not only this, but also the fact that the prices and the stocks would remain at a lower cost for these kind of people, knowing the fact that they are not able to pay full price of certain aspects and things. Based on this, I would then conclude saying that your correct answer would then be (Option C) as it reads the following:
"<span>focus public attention on medical care for people with disabilities".
This would signify that the attention, and the help that these people would then need are going to be helped, and not disrespected.</span>
