1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Black_prince [1.1K]
3 years ago
14

Which combination of fiscal policy actions would most likely be offsetting? 
A. Increase taxes and government spending
B. Decrea

se taxes and increase government spending
C. Increase taxes, but make no change in government spending
D. Decrease taxes, but make no change in government spending
Business
1 answer:
Delvig [45]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Option (A) is correct.

Explanation:

When there is an increase in both the components of aggregate demand i.e. government spending and taxes then this will most likely to offset the fiscal policy actions.

If there is an increase in the taxes, as a result aggregate demand decreases because of lower disposable income. This policy action is known as Contractionary fiscal policy.

Whereas, if there is an increase in the Government spending, as a result aggregate demand increases. This policy action is known as Expansionary fiscal policy.

But this will also largely depend upon the tax multiplier and government spending multiplier.

You might be interested in
The market where existing securities are sold is:______.
Cerrena [4.2K]

Answer:

b. the secondary market.

Explanation:

The secondary market is the market in which the securities are offered and sold which are previously issued by the company. No new securities are to be offered to the investors this case refer to the primary market in which the initial public offer is made i.e. new securities are offered to the general public

Therefore in the given case, the correct option is b. the secondary market

6 0
4 years ago
What are the relative merits of three trade agreements and alliances?
IgorLugansk [536]

What are the relative merits of three trade agreements and alliances? WTO governs international trade. NAFTA is with North America. EU is Europe's trading bloc.

Trade agreements are essentially pacts between various countries that allow of trade between them. The trade is constructed and based on setting up tax, tariff and treaty agreements that allow for the participants to have investments within the trade. Two or more countries participate on the terms of their trade agreements which allows them to trade with one another.

8 0
3 years ago
Presented below is information related to Bobby Engram Company.
Natasha_Volkova [10]

Answer:

A. $ 98,210

B1. Cost to retail percentage 60%

B2. Cost to retail percentage 65.73 %

B3. Cost to retail percentage 58 %

B4. Cost to retail percentage 63.33 %

Explanation:

A. Computation for the ending inventory at retail

Inventory at Retail

Beginning Inventory $ 100,000

Purchase ( Net ) $ 200,000

Net Markup $ 10345

Less Net Markdown ($26,135)

Less Sales Revenue ($ 186,000)

Ending Inventory $ 98,210

Therefore the ending inventory at retail will be $ 98,210

B1) Computation for a cost-to-retail percentage

Excluding both markups and markdowns.

Cost to Retail Percentage

Excluding both Markup and Markdown

Cost Retail

Beginning Inventory $ 58,000 $ 100,000

Purchase (Net) $ 122,000 $ 200,000

Total $ 180,000 $ 300,000

Cost to retail percentage = $180,000/$300,000 Cost to retail percentage = 60%

B2. Computation for a cost-to-retail percentage Excluding Markups but Including Markdown

Cost Retail

Beginning Inventory $ 58,000 $ 100,000

Purchase (Net) $ 122,000 $ 200,000

Less Mark down ($ 26,135)

Total $ 180,000 $273,865

Cost to retail percentage= $180,000 /$ 273,865*100

Cost to retail percentage= 65.73 %

B3. Computation for a cost-to-retail percentage Excluding Markdowns but including Markups

Cost Retail

Beginning Inventory $ 58,000 $ 100,000

Purchase Net $ 122,000 $ 200,000

Add Net Markups $ 10,345

Total $180,000 $ 310,345

Cost to retail percentage = $180,000 / $ 310,345*100

Cost to retail percentage = 58 %

B4. Computation for a cost-to-retail percentage Including both Markups and Markdown

Cost Retail

Beginning Inventory $58,000 $100,000

Purchase Net $ 122,000 $ 200,000

Net Markups $ 10,345

Less Net Mardown ($26,135)

Total $ 180,000 $ 284,210

Cost to retail percentage = $ 180,000/ $ 284,210 × 100

Cost to retail percentage = 63.33 %

Therefore the cost-to-retail percentage are:

B1. Cost to retail percentage 60%

B2. Cost to retail percentage 65.73 %

B3. Cost to retail percentage 58 %

B4. Cost to retail percentage 63.33 %

8 0
3 years ago
An example of an economic variable is​ "value of the ​dollar"long dash—which is currently highlong dash—compared with the​ Yen,
katrin [286]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Tamarisk Co. reports the following information for 2020: sales revenue $769,400, cost of goods sold $502,400, operating expenses
horsena [70]

Answer:

<u>Statement of Changes In Equity</u>

                                                Common Stock    Retained Earning     Total

Beginning Balance                      $365,300               $91,010            $456,310

<u>During the Year 2020</u>

Profit for the Year                                                    $120,800            $120,800

Dividends                                                                   ($14,160)             ($14,160)

Balance at End                            $365,300            $197,650            $562,950

Explanation:

First, Calculate the Profit / Loss for the Year

Income Statement for the year ended 2020

Sales Revenue                                                                          $769,400

Less Cost of goods sold                                                         ($502,400)

Gross Profit                                                                               $267,000

Operating expenses                                                                 ($88,400)

Net Profit/(Loss)                                                                         $178,600

Other Comprehensive Income

Less unrealized holding loss                                                   ($57,800)

Total Profit and Loss and other comprehensive income       $120,800

<u>See the statement prepared above in terms of IAS 1 of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)</u>

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Campaigns focus on their __________ efforts in the last days before the general election.
    5·1 answer
  • Eastevan Company calculated its return on investment as 10 percent. Sales are now $300,000, and the amount of total operating as
    10·1 answer
  • Please help me I have less then 40mins please
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following combinations include only services? a a health consult, prescription medication, and kickboxing lessons b
    7·2 answers
  • The top management team at Sierra Infusion is concerned about the declining performance of firms in their industry. The team mem
    8·1 answer
  • The Wagner Company tries to follow a pure "residual" dividend policy. Earnings and dividends last year were $100 million and $20
    10·2 answers
  • noted the following: Units Work-in-process, August 1 (50% complete) 4,000 Units started during the month of August 20,500 Work-i
    6·1 answer
  • There are ___ credit reporting companies
    7·1 answer
  • Do consumers benefit in any way from monopolistic competition relative to perfect competition?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is one of the main things to consider when evaluating a business opportunity?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!