I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
Answer: The battle of Jacinto
Explanation: it was the final battle of the Texas revolution and it resulted in the defeat of the Mexican army and independence for Texas
Answer:
Telephone, internal combustion engine, and electrical light
Explanation:
telephone: it allowed for instant communication, communication by voice, and it paved the way for future inovations in telephone technology.
engine: it was powered by gas and air, which made it impractical for widespread public use.
light: Electric lights allowed factories to stay open longer and produce more goods.
Hope this helps dude!
Answer:Many scholars believe that the collapse of the Indus Valley Civilization was caused by climate change. Some experts believe the drying of the Saraswati River, which began around 1900 BCE, was the main cause for climate change, while others conclude that a great flood struck the area.
Explanation:
